Skip to main content
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2013 Jan 2.
Published in final edited form as: Neuroimage. 2011 Aug 2;59(1):530–539. doi: 10.1016/j.neuroimage.2011.07.085

Table 3.

Statistical Fusion Summary

Individual Rater Accuracy*
Region Mode Median 25th-75th Percentile µ ± σ
Simulated Cylinder Training 0.989 0.985 – 0.993 0.985 ± 0.033
Testing 0.964 0.348–0.975 0.769 ± 0.335

Axial Cerebellum Training 0.670 0.394 – 0.823 0.608 ± 0.282
Testing 0.792 0.686 – 0.888 0.758 ± 0.195

Coronal Cerebellum Training 0.691 0.686 – 0.888 0.599 ± 0.266
Testing 0.789 0.708 – 0.899 0.785 ± 0.170

Sagittal Cerebellum Training 0.684 0.304 – 0.800 0.583 ± 0.272
Testing 0.876 0.829 – 0.913 0.842 ± 0.140
*

Reported as fraction correct.

The training phase of the simulated cylinder used a pre–label mask. No other experiments used a pre-label mask