Skip to main content
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2012 Dec 1.
Published in final edited form as: Cogn Psychol. 2011 Oct 1;63(4):210–238. doi: 10.1016/j.cogpsych.2011.08.001

Table 5.

Best fitting model parameters for Experiment 3.

Dual as aa Ters Tera P ts sda X2 aBIC
Group 0.110 0.138 286 301 0.356 65 1.824 1296.7 1831.5
Ind 0.113 (.02) 0.146 (.02) 286 (20) 306 (22) 0.343 (.08) 74 (26) 1.821 (.54) 183.2 (52) 1622.3 (245)
Spot as aa Ters Tera P rd sda

Group 0.111 0.139 283 304 0.369 0.016 1.781 1190.4 1701.8
Ind 0.112 (.02) 0.146 (.02) 284 (.02) 301 (.02) 0.352 (.09) 0.015 (.01) 1.691 (.48) 168.5 (45) 1531.3 (221)
DSTP as aa Ters Tera c μss μrs2 μtar μfl

Group 0.116 0.136 284 303 0.116 0.866 0.379 0.050 0.249 1244.6 1821.6
Ind 0.121 (.02) 0.161 (.03) 286 (.02) 310 (.02) 0.132 (.05) 0.649 (.18) 0.500 (.17) 0.061 (.03) 0.218 (.10) 174.4 (43) 1615.7 (238)

Note. For individual fits, standard deviations across participants are shown in parenthesis. as = boundary separation in speed blocks; aa = boundary separation in accuracy blocks; Ters = mean nondecision time in speed blocks; Tera = mean nondecision time in accuracy blocks; p = perceptual input; ts = target selection time (ms); sda = spotlight width; rd = rate of decrease in spotlight; c = stimulus selection boundary separation; μss = drift rate for stimulus selection; μrs2 = drift rate for response selection phase 2; μtar = drift rate from target; μfl = combined drift rate for flankers; aBIC = approximate BIC.