Skip to main content
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2012 Nov 30.
Published in final edited form as: Psychiatry Res. 2011 Sep 21;194(2):119–129. doi: 10.1016/j.pscychresns.2011.02.003

Figure 1. Go/No-Go task.

Figure 1

Participants were instructed to respond to target letters “x” and “y”, and withhold response on nonalternating presentations of target letters. Response to targets (“x” or “y” alternating) constituted the “Go” condition of this task whereas the presentation of “lure” letters, to which a prepotent response has been practiced but becomes inappropriate (“x” followed by “x” or “y followed by “y”), constituted the “No-Go” condition. There were 5 more times as many “targets” as “lures” to emphasize a prepotent response.