Skip to main content
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2012 May 1.
Published in final edited form as: Psychol Sci. 2011 Apr 5;22(5):641–649. doi: 10.1177/0956797611403156

Table 1.

Means and SDs of perceptions of judges, affect, and appraisals by feedback condition

Feedback Condition
Social Evaluation Non-Social

Social
evaluation
Social evaluative
threat
Control

“[Judges] thought I
performed well”1
4.77 (1.0)a 3.34 (1.4)b --
Negative affect2 1.6 (.5) b 1.9 (.9) a 1.4 (.4) b
Positive affect 2 2.7 (.9)a 2.3 (.8)b 2.4 (1.) ab
Threat ratio .73 (.3)a .91 (.4)b .73 (.2)a

Note.

1

Ratings for the male and female judges were averaged.

2

Means are adjusted for prespeech affect ratings. Different subscript letters across rows indicate significant differences by feedback condition.

HHS Vulnerability Disclosure