Skip to main content
. 2011 Oct 18;6(10):e26157. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0026157

Table 1. Analysis of genotypes for Q223R in case-control studies, according to different allelic modes of action.

Reference Co-dominant: OR (95% CI)* Co-dominant: p-value* Dominant: OR (95% CI)** Dominant: Chi2 (p-value)** Recessive: OR (95% CI)** Recessive: Chi2 (p-value)**
Caucasians
Chagnon 1999 [61] 0.89 (0.74–1.07) 0.221 0.87 (0.52–1.45) 0.34 (0.557) 0.66 (0.36–1.19) 2.19 (0.139)
Yiannakouris 2001 [10] 1.45 (0.75–2.80) 0.263 0.96 (0.38–2.44) 0.01 (0.924) 5.54 (1.13–27.27) 7.40 (0.007)
Mattevi 2002 [31] 1.62 (1.15–2.26) 0.005 1.60 (0.99–2.59) 4.05 (0.044) 2.44 (1.16–5.12) 6.92 (0.009)
Portolés 2006 [62] 0.84 (0.68–1.04) 0104 0.88 (0.65–1.18) 0.84 (0.360) 0.62 (0.38–1.03) 3.96 (0.047)
De Krom 2007 [63] 1.00 (0.73–1.37) 0.991 0.77 (0.45–1.30) 1.11 (0.293) 1.33 (0.76–2.30) 1.14 (0.285)
Mergen 2007 [32] 1.43 (1.03–1.99) 0.034 1.65 (1.06–2.56) 5.45 (0.020) 1.31 (0.60–2.83) 0.55 (0.457)
Bienertova 2008 [64] 0.88 (0.57–1.36) 0.564 1.06 (0.50–2.23) 0.03 (0.872) 0.65 (0.30–1.44) 1.33 (0.248)
Masuo 2008 [16] 1.87 (1.10–3.16) 0.021 2.10 (0.90–4.90) 3.55 (0.060) 2.89 (0.88–9.49) 4.22 (0.040)
Overall I2 = 69.8% I2 p = 0.002 1.13 (0.87–1.45) 0.368 I2 = 66.5% I2 p = 0.004
Asians
Endo 2000 [65] 0.89 (0.58–1.37) 0.604 1.27 (0.20–8.25) 0.10 (0.754) 0.84 (0.49–1.42) 0.51 (0.475)
Wang 2006 [30] 1.32 (0.7–2.38) 0.347 1.51 (0.75–3.04) 1.57 (0.210) 0.39 (0.01–13.37) 0.61 (0.433)
Overall 1.02 (0.71–1.47) 0.924 1.48 (0.77–2.85) 0.244 0.82 (0.49–1.38) 0.459
Mixed populations
Guízar-mendoza 2005 [66] 0.70 (0.36–1.34) 0.278 0.78 (0.33–1.84) 0.40 (0.527) 0.33 (0.04–2.74) 1.86 (0.173)
Duarte 2007 [67] 1.24 (0.89–1.71) 0.202 1.65 (1.02–2.68) 4.69 (0.030) 0.86 (0.45–1.65) 0.24 (0.628)
Overall 1.00 (0.58–1.72) 0.991 1.24 (0.60–2.54) 0.564 0.79 (0.43–1.48) 0.465
Overall all populations I2 = 56.7% I2 p = 0.006 1.15 (0.93–1.43) 0.185 I2 = 52.0% I2 p = 0.018

Odds ratios and 95% confidence intervals are given. Statistically significant results are shown in bold. Where the overall measure was significantly heterogeneous, the I2 value and its p-value are given instead of the overall measure.

*Values from generalized linear model, overall results from meta-analysis, random model.

**Values from meta-analysis, random model.