. 2011 Oct 20;7(10):e1002343. doi: 10.1371/journal.pgen.1002343

Table 3. Comparison of effect sizes for genetic versus intrinsic terms in immunological parameters.

Genetic term	Response	Model^a	d.f.	Coefficient	Sex	Body weight^b	Eye lens weight^b
Il1b	Il1b expression	Additive	4	−0.15 to 0.62	n.s.	−0.32	−0.04
	Gata3 96 h expression	Heterozygosity	1	−1.08	−3.73	n.s.	−0.55
Il2	Il10 expression	Heterozygosity	1	−0.42	n.s.	n.s.	n.s.
Il12b	Il1b expression	Additive	2	0.47 to 1.56	n.s.	−0.32	−0.04
	Il2 expression	Heterozygosity	1	−1.15	n.s.	n.s.	n.s.

Under an additive model, the range of effect sizes for alleles is shown compared against the most common haplotype at that locus; under a heterozygosity model, values of heterozygotes were compared against homozygotes (see text).

Effect size shown for comparative purposes based on the interquartile range for females within a single season (Spring 2008).