Skip to main content
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2012 Nov 1.
Published in final edited form as: Genet Epidemiol. 2011 Sep 15;35(7):581–591. doi: 10.1002/gepi.20603

Table 2. Test Powera in Meta-analysis of Three Case-control Studies (α = 10-8).

Study-site 1 2 3 Summary Test Statistic

Cases 500 1000 500 Score-based Wald-based
Controls 500 1000 5000 ZHMb ZHTc ZSZd ZHM ZHT ZSZ
Odds-ratio
MAF
1.3 1.3 1.3
0.2 0.2 0.2 0.356 0.349 0.301 0.348 0.343 0.291
0.3 0.3 0.3 0.638 0.632 0.563 0.634 0.629 0.555
0.3 0.3 0.2 0.543 0.537 0.426 0.530 0.527 0.418

Odds-ratio
MAF
1.4 1.4 1.4
0.2 0.2 0.2 0.887 0.886 0.840 0.886 0.885 0.836
0.3 0.3 0.3 0.974 0.974 0.951 0.974 0.974 0.949
0.3 0.3 0.2 0.953 0.950 0.908 0.951 0.950 0.904

Odds-ratio
MAF
1.0 1.4 1.3
0.2 0.2 0.2 0.188 0.086 0.170 0.185 0.086 0.164
0.3 0.3 0.3 0.457 0.230 0.420 0.452 0.221 0.409
0.3 0.3 0.2 0.323 0.168 0.260 0.309 0.166 0.254
a)

fraction of 1000 replications rejecting H0 at α = 10-8

b)

homogeneity weights of equation (17)

c)

heterogeneity weights of equation (19)

d)

weights proportional to square root of study size