Table 5.
Direct and Indirect Ambivalence and Positive Affect by Child’s Gender
| Sons |
Daughters |
|||||
| Model 1 Direct only |
Model 2 Indirect only |
Model 3 Direct and indirect |
Model 4 Direct only |
Model 5 Indirect only |
Model 6 Direct and indirect |
|
| β (SE) | β (SE) | β (SE) | β (SE) | β (SE) | β (SE) | |
| Married | .07 (0.87) | .09 (0.93) | .07 (0.88) | .08 (0.72) | .07 (0.73) | .08 (0.72) |
| Subjective health | .36** (0.40) | .37** (0.42) | .36** (0.40) | .24** (0.29) | .25** (0.30) | .24** (0.29) |
| Non-White | .24** (0.91) | .26** (0.98) | .25 (0.93) | .12 (0.82) | .13 (0.84) | .13 (0.83) |
| Direct ambivalence | −.31** (0.26) | — | −.32** (0.27) | −.19* (0.17) | — | −.17 (0.19) |
| Indirect ambivalence | — | −.04 (0.18) | −.04 (0.17) | — | −.11 (0.11) | −.04 (0.12) |
| Model statistics | ||||||
| R2 | .27 | .17 | .27 | .10 | .08 | .10 |
| df | 4 | 4 | 5 | 4 | 4 | 5 |
| N | 101 | 101 | 101 | 153 | 153 | 153 |
Note: df = degrees of freedom.
*p < .05; **p < .01.