Skip to main content
. 2011 Oct 14;66B(6):769–781. doi: 10.1093/geronb/gbr108

Table 5.

Direct and Indirect Ambivalence and Positive Affect by Child’s Gender

Sons
Daughters
Model 1 Direct only
Model 2 Indirect only
Model 3 Direct and indirect
Model 4 Direct only
Model 5 Indirect only
Model 6 Direct and indirect
β (SE) β (SE) β (SE) β (SE) β (SE) β (SE)
Married .07 (0.87) .09 (0.93) .07 (0.88) .08 (0.72) .07 (0.73) .08 (0.72)
Subjective health .36** (0.40) .37** (0.42) .36** (0.40) .24** (0.29) .25** (0.30) .24** (0.29)
Non-White .24** (0.91) .26** (0.98) .25 (0.93) .12 (0.82) .13 (0.84) .13 (0.83)
Direct ambivalence −.31** (0.26) −.32** (0.27) −.19* (0.17) −.17 (0.19)
Indirect ambivalence −.04 (0.18) −.04 (0.17) −.11 (0.11) −.04 (0.12)
Model statistics
    R2 .27 .17 .27 .10 .08 .10
    df 4 4 5 4 4 5
    N 101 101 101 153 153 153

Note: df = degrees of freedom.

*p < .05; **p < .01.