Skip to main content
. 2011 Oct 19;6(10):e26314. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0026314

Table 2. Comparison of different filtering strategies for D. melanogaster.

Method Data Assembly size (Mb) Assembled genome (Mb) Accuracy Recall N50 Reads (million)
Untrimmed SRR063698 full 120.5 106.0 0.88 0.63 6,939 54.3
reduced 113.4 84.4 0.74 0.50 1,717 13.7
SRR063699 full 108.1 77.4 0.72 0.45 1,278 26.8
reduced 63.6 41.2 0.65 0.24 411 6.7
ConDeTri SRR063698 full 118.9 102,8 0.86 0.61 8,222 43.4
reduced 103.6 65.9 0.64 0.39 1,007 11.0
SRR063699 full 77.5 59.0 0.76 0.35 508 10.0
reduced 23.4 18.0 0.77 0.11 234 2.5
SolexaQA SRR063698 full 115.7 93.7 0.81 0.56 5,691 37.8
reduced 93.4 51.5 0.55 0.31 677 9.6
SRR063699 full 60.5 40.2 0.66 0.24 408 8.7
reduced 16.7 11.6 0.70 0.07 203 2.2
Quake SRR063698 full 114.3 81.6 0.71 0.48 21,615 49.6
reduced 70.6 16.5 0.23 0.10 683 10.4
SRR063699 full 1.9 0.1 0.06 0.00 6,678 5.9
reduced 1.4 0.1 0.04 0.00 3,808 1.3
Bwa SRR063698 full 119.4 99.1 0.83 0.59 13,953 46.2
reduced 107.0 70.1 0.66 0.42 1,264 11.7
SRR063699 full 92.2 58.1 0.63 0.34 732 17.4
reduced 47.5 33.0 0.70 0.20 294 4.4

Assembly size, size of assembled D. melanogaster reference genome, recall, accuracy, N50 size and number of reads using the different data sets.