Skip to main content
. 2011 Feb 3;139(4):802–809. doi: 10.1378/chest.10-1798

Table 2.

—Patient or Surrogate Knowledge and Attitudes Regarding CPR, Code Status Preferences, and Goals-of-Care Discussions

Knowledge or Attitude Measured No.
Knowledge of what “CPR” stands for
 Perceived knowledge 65
 Actual knowledge 17
Knowledge of what treatments doctors use during CPR
 Perceived knowledge 95
 Actual knowledge of the three main components of CPR
  Cardiac defibrillation 32
  Chest compressions 71
  Intubation with mechanical ventilation 7
Preferences regarding code status (verbatim text shown)
 “In case your (your loved one’s) heart stopped beating or your (his/her) lungs stopped breathing, which would mean that you (he/she) were (was) dying, would you want your (his/her) physicians…”
  “… to use defibrillation (that is, electricity) on your (his/her) chest to shock your (his/her) heart to make it start beating again?” [yes] 84
  “… to use chest compressions (that is, to push up and down on your [his/her] chest) to try to keep the blood moving through your (his/her) body?” [yes] 83
  “… to use intubation (that is, to have a tube placed through your [his/her] mouth and into your [his/her] windpipe) so that a breathing machine can then move air in and out of your (his/her) lungs?” [yes] 90
Patient code status as documented in medical record
 Full code 85
 Do not resuscitate 13
 No documentation 2
Discussions with physician during current hospitalization, by patient/surrogate report
 Discussion about CPR preferences 50
 Discussion about at least one goal of care 51
 Discussion about CPR preferences and at least one goal of care 28
 No discussion about CPR preferences or at least one goal of care 27
Participant attitudes at end of interview
 Believed it was helpful to talk about chances of surviving cardiac arrest after CPR 80
 Believed it was helpful to talk about goals of care 71