Skip to main content
. 2011 Sep 9;27(21):3024–3028. doi: 10.1093/bioinformatics/btr514

Table 1.

Similarity of random and balanced subsets with populations and comparison of population-level predictive performance with that estimated with sampled subsets

Prediction algorithm Yeast
Population Random subsets Balanced subsets
M1 0.71 ± 0.02 0.70 ± 0.02 0.42 ± 0.02
M2 0.67 ± 0.02 0.66 ± 0.02 0.52 ± 0.02
M3 0.57 ± 0.01 0.57 ± 0.02 0.53 ± 0.02
M4 0.71 ± 0.02 0.71 ± 0.02 0.62 ± 0.02
Similarity to population 0.00 ± 0.03 −0.71 ± 0.01

Prediction algorithm Human
Population Random subsets Balanced subsets

M1 0.72 ± 0.01 0.72 ± 0.01 0.45 ± 0.01
M2 0.67 ± 0.01 0.67 ± 0.01 0.49 ± 0.02
M3 0.58 ± 0.01 0.58 ± 0.02 0.51 ± 0.02
M4 0.72 ± 0.01 0.71 ± 0.01 0.63 ± 0.02
Similarity to population 0.02 ± 0.01 −1.00 ± 0.00

Similarity is reported in the form of the average correlation coefficient ± the standard deviation. Predictive performance is reported in the form of the average AUC ± the standard deviation.