Table 2.
HRQoL Assessment with different questionnaires and their results.
| Author | Year | Ref. | Tools | Results |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Spechler et al. | 2001 | [6] | SF-36 | No significant difference between medical and surgical group |
| Bammer et al. | 2001 | [2] | WBS | Improved significantly at more than 5 years of followup |
| Olberg et al. | 2005 | [23] | PGWBI | No significant difference between medical and surgical group |
| Contini and Scarpignato | 2004 | [22] | SF-36 | Normal score 2 years after LARS |
| Ciovica et al. | 2006 | [27] | GIQLI + HRQL | QoL normalized after LARS and significantly higher than a medically treated group |
| Dallemagne et al. | 2006 | [25] | GIQLI | Significantly better than preoperatively at 10 years |
| Draaisma et al. | 2006 | [11] | VAS | 30% improvement after surgery |
| Gee et al. | 2008 | [34] | GERD−HRQL | Near normal score at long-term followup |
| Fein et al. | 2008 | [33] | GIQLI | Significant improvement of the QoL after 10 years |
| Lundell et al. | 2009 | [39] | PGWBI | Similar to that of normal population in both surgical and medical group at 12 years |
VAS: Visual Analogue Scale.