Table 3.
For the PROM study, one way ANOVA analyses were used to compare each parameter across the three regions.
Parameter | Frontal | Temporal | Occipital | |
---|---|---|---|---|
PROM | Yv (%) | 60.8 ± 3 | 59.5 ± 3 | 59.3 ± 3 |
CBF (ml/100g/min) | 43.9 ± 6 | 45.7 ± 4 | 54.1 ± 7 ** | |
CMRO2 (μmol/100g/min) | 130 ± 17 | 140 ± 17 | 166 ± 18 ** | |
| ||||
Ishii et al., 1996 | Yv (%) | 59.4 ± 7 | 58.7 ± 7 | 58.7 ± 6 |
CBF (ml/100g/min) | 54.8 ± 9 | 56.3 ± 9 | 66.1 ± 13 * | |
CMRO2 (μmol/100g/min) | 160 ± 27 | 169 ± 32 | 194 ± 46 * |
(p < 0.05),
(p< 0.01).