Table 3.
Secondary outcomes | Glucose |
Fructose |
HFCS |
Effects | P value | |||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
0 wk | 2 wk | 0 wk | 2 wk | 0 wk | 2 wk | |||
Body weight (kg)a | 76.8 ± 3.5 | 77.2 ± 3.7 | 76.8 ± 2.6 | 76.7 ± 2.6 | 74.3 ± 3.7 | 74.7 ± 3.7 | Sugar | 0.32 |
Gender | 0.62 | |||||||
BMI | 0.50 | |||||||
Fasting HDL (mmol/liter)b | 1.2 ± 0.1 | 1.2 ± 0.1 | 1.2 ± 0.1 | 1.1 ± 0.1 | 1.2 ± 0.1 | 1.2 ± 0.1 | Sugar | 0.92 |
Gender | 0.37 | |||||||
BMI | 0.22 | |||||||
PP LDL (mmol/liter)b | 2.5 ± 0.2 | 2.6 ± 0.2c | 2.0 ± 0.2 | 2.3 ± 0.2*,c,d | 2.1 ± 0.2 | 2.7 ± 0.2**,d | Sugar | 0.0033 |
Gender | 0.010 | |||||||
BMI | 0.54 | |||||||
PP non-HDL-C (mmol/liter)b | 3.0 ± 0.2 | 3.2 ± 0.2c | 2.5 ± 0.2 | 3.0 ± 0.2**,c,d | 2.6 ± 0.2 | 3.4 ± 0.2**,d | Sugar | 0.0012 |
Gender | 0.017 | |||||||
BMI | 0.27 | |||||||
PP apoB (g/liter)b | 0.78 ± 0.05 | 0.83 ± 0.05c | 0.62 ± 0.04 | 0.73 ± 0.05***,c,b | 0.68 ± 0.05 | 0.84 ± 0.06**,d | Sugar | 0.031 |
Gender | 0.10 | |||||||
BMI | 0.56 | |||||||
PP RLP-C (mmol/liter)a | 0.17 ± 0.02 | 0.19 ± 0.02c | 0.16 ± 0.02 | 0.23 ± 0.03**,b | 0.15 ± 0.02 | 0.21 ± 0.02***,c,b | Sugar | 0.035 |
Gender | 0.37 | |||||||
BMI | 0.034 | |||||||
PP RLP-TG (mmol/liter)e | 0.34 ± 0.07 | 0.44 ± 0.06 | 0.35 ± 0.06 | 0.58 ± 0.08*** | 0.33 ± 0.06 | 0.54 ± 0.09*** | Sugar | 0.088 |
Gender | 0.20 | |||||||
BMI | 0.012 | |||||||
Fasting sdLDL-C (mmol/liter)f | 0.65 ± 0.08 | 0.77 ± 0.10**** | 0.47 ± 0.04 | 0.59 ± 0.06*** | 0.61 ± 0.08 | 0.78 ± 0.09** | Sugar | 0.37 |
Gender | 0.0019 | |||||||
BMI | 0.11 | |||||||
PP sdLDL-C (mmol/liter)f | 0.65 ± 0.08 | 0.79 ± 0.10*,c | 0.48 ± 0.04 | 0.64 ± 0.07**,c,d | 0.60 ± 0.08 | 0.86 ± 0.10**,d | Sugar | 0.019 |
Gender | <0.0001 | |||||||
BMI | 0.0125 |
P > 0.05 for differences among groups at baseline for all outcomes. Mean ± sem. PP, Postprandial.
PROC MIXED two-factor (sugar, gender) analysis with adjustment for BMI on absolute Δ (2 wk vs. 0 wk).
PROC MIXED two-factor (sugar, gender) analysis with adjustment for BMI, ΔBW (2 wk to 0 wk), and outcomeB on absolute Δ (2 wk vs. 0 wk).
Δ (2 wk vs. 0 wk) significantly different from d Δ (2 wk vs. 0 wk), Tukey's multiple comparison test.
PROC MIXED two-factor (sugar, gender) analysis with adjustment for BMI and outcomeB on absolute Δ (2 wk vs. 0 wk).
PROC MIXED two-factor (sugar, gender) analysis with adjustment for BMI and ΔBW (2 wk to 0 wk) on absolute Δ (2 wk vs. 0 wk).
P < 0.01,
P < 0.0001,
P < 0.001,
P < 0.05, LS means of Δ different from zero.