Skip to main content
. 2011 Apr 14;2011:645030. doi: 10.1155/2011/645030

Table 1.

Effect of nerve sparing in radical prostatectomy on sexual function recovery.

Author Type No. of patients Followup months Potent (%) P
UNS BNS
Before and up to 2003
 Quinlan et al. (1991) [43] RRP 503 18 56 76 NA
 Weldon et al. (1997) [44] RPP 50 18 68 73 NA
 Catalona et al. (1999) [45] RRP 858 18 47 68 NA
 Stanford et al. (2000) [46] RRP 938 >18 41 44 NA
After 2003
 Kundu et al. (2004) [39] RRP 1834 18 53 76 NA
 Harris (2007) [18] RPP 140 12 27 49 0.02
 Marien and Lepor (2008) [47] RRP 1110 24 44 60 0.011
 Krambeck et al. (2009) [48] RRP 807 >6 53 72 <0.001
 Menon et al. (2007) [49] RALP 1142 12 58 70 NA
 Hakimi et al. (2009) [50] RALP 60 12 64 77 NA

UNS: Unilateral nerve sparing; BNS: Bilateral nerve sparing; RRP: Radical retropubic prostatectomy; RPP: Radical perineal prostatectomy; RALP: Robotic-assisted laparoscopic prostatectomy; NA: Not applicable.