Skip to main content
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2012 Nov 1.
Published in final edited form as: J Thorac Oncol. 2011 Nov;6(11):1841–1848. doi: 10.1097/JTO.0b013e31822e59b3

Table 4.

Annual CT screening vs. no intervention. Sensitivity analyses in cohorts of men age 50.

Scenario $/QALY compared to no intervention
Base Case* $149,000

70% Adherence to screening $180,000
CT sensitivity = 100% $141,000
Less-costly helical CT ($188, HOPPS) $120,000
Follow up nodules <4mm $148,000
Lower operative mortality (3%, lobectomy; 0.1% mediastinoscopy; 0.2% VATS) $141,000
Delay before return to baseline health after resection:
 1 month $147,000
 6 months $150,000
 12 months $154,000
 24 months $161,000
 No recovery $209,000
*

Base case values: perfect adherence; CT sensitivity based on diameter; screening CT cost of $283 based on Physician Fee Schedule; no follow-up of nodules <4mm; operative mortality 4% (lobectomy), 0.3% (mediastinoscopy) and 0.5% (VATS); and 3 month recovery after resection. HOPPS, Hospital Outpatient Prospective Payment System; VATS, video-assisted thoracoscopy.