Skip to main content
. 2011 Feb 5;12(4):637–652. doi: 10.1093/biostatistics/kxr002

Fig. 5.

Fig. 5.

Upper panels: scatter plot of county-specific standardized health effect estimates for PM10 − 2.5, Inline graphic, comparing 2 approaches: (1) including ME modeling with monitor-specific weighted error variance (WME) versus (2) using TM as PM10 − 2.5 exposure. Lower panels: scatter plot of county-specific standardized health-effect estimates for PM10 − 2.5, Inline graphic, using exposure derived from WME comparing Bayesian risk estimation versus regression calibration.