Skip to main content
. 2011 Feb 5;12(4):637–652. doi: 10.1093/biostatistics/kxr002

Table 3.

Simulation study results: median bias, average 95% confidence interval (C.I.) width, and root mean squared error for PM10–2.5 relative risk in Clark County, Nevada. At-risk population is allocated to each monitor either equally (Scenario 1) or proportional to the city population that the monitor is in (Scenario 2). Exposure measures considered include: TM or ME modeling without (ME) or with (WME) heteroskedastic variances

Scenario 1
Scenario 2
True TM ME True TM WME
Bias (× 104) – 0.02 – 0.39 – 0.18 – 0.01 – 0.33 – 0.16
C.I. width (× 104) 1.62 3.11 3.93 1.94 3.04 3.03