Women’s collectives | Disaster committees | |
What was the context? | A poor and marginalised section of the community in a rural town in Nepal | Rural coastal communities in Krabi Province, Thailand, affected by 2004 tsunami |
How did the collective action emerge? | NGO facilitated the formation and initial running of self-help women’s collectives | Initiated by a wide range of international, national and local organisations, and the communities themselves; frequently built on existing committees |
What was the motivation? | The NGO had a mandate for development and the women involved sought to better their material context | Concern over future coastal hazards, perceived lack of action of the government, and concerns over livelihood security |
What were the activities of the collective action? | -Group savings -Budgeting -Sustainable business loans, -Advocacy to government, -Organisation for group projects |
-Enhancement of disaster preparedness of the community -Capacity building for disaster risk reduction and early warning, -Mobilisation of support from local government and NGOs |
Contribution to adaptive capacity | -enhances social networks for information dissemination -improves access to finances -provides a space to discuss and address new issues, such as climate change -facilitates individual empowerment through group action |
-addresses underlying causes of vulnerability -builds capacity to cope with shocks -links disaster risk reduction with livelihoods, natural resource management, poverty reduction -integrates disaster risk reduction and climate change adaptation. -helps to better define and coordinate different actors |
Relationship with local government | -Widespread mistrust amongst the community of government -Significant issues around mandate, structure and capacity -Established collectives lobbied their local councilors with relative levels of success |
-Lack of trust amongst communities in government institutions -Lack of human resources, knowledge, experience and skills relating to disaster risk reduction and a lack of government initiative from sub-national authorities, -Challenges in the collaboration and communication between government and other stakeholders |
What were the constraining factors | -Gender conflicts -Cultural and religious conflicts -Lack of resources at all levels -Political and social disempowerment -context of poverty |
-Lack of experience and awareness of hazards. -Religious and cultural beliefs about destiny. -Lack of support from political and religious leaders. -Lack of resources. -Lack of information and guidance. |
What are the enabling factors | -The commitment of individual actors, -Long-term funding commitment from international donors -Good staffing -Robust social networks |
-Incentives that are beneficial for employment -Existing social networks -Support from political and religious leaders. -Integration with other priorities. |