Skip to main content
. 2012 Jan 2;59(1):340–348. doi: 10.1016/j.neuroimage.2011.07.066

Table 1.

Simulation parameters and results (signal-to-noise ratio = 13.8 dB).

Values used to generate data ER + IR data
A=λ0.30.60.30.1λ00.100.2λ0.100.70.4λ
B=λ0000λ0000.15λ000.10λ
ER data
A=λ0.30.60.30.1λ00.100.2λ0.100.70.4λ
Estimates using the ER + IR model A=λ0.3250.6610.2390.097λ00.05900.105λ0.02100.6380.3975λ
B=0000000000.1380000.02900
F = − 3613.2; MSE = 9.08%
A=λ0.2570.4110.2400.101λ00.03200.036λ0.00200.5520.142λ
B=0000000000.0120000.01000
F = − 3862.5; MSE = 71.13%
Estimates using the ER1 model A=λ0.1610.4100.1000.103λ00.05100.074λ0.02700.6850.165λ
F = − 3645.3; MSE = 51.83%
A=λ0.3380.1350.5230.080λ00.00900.016λ0.02300.5790.403λ
F = − 3855.1; MSE = 33.51%
Estimates using the ER2 model A=λ0.1760.4780.1230.098λ0.2050.0410.0140.031λ0.0260.0760.1230.564λ
F = − 3653.6; MSE = 85.37%
A=λ0.3280.0240.2780.139λ0.0480.0190.0350.065λ0.0090.0300.2030.059λ
F = − 3902.4; MSE = 77.64%