Skip to main content
. 2011 May 4;278(1725):3644–3653. doi: 10.1098/rspb.2010.2769

Table 1.

Relative importance of climate and accessibility for species occurrences. [W, average (±s.d.) and median (minimum; maximum) summed Akaike weights for climate and accessibility. Inline graphic, average (±s.d.) and median (minimum; maximum) proportion of variation in species occurrences uniquely explained by climate or accessibility after controlling for the other factor. The values were either calculated across all species (n = 1016) or only for species with a positive model-averaged parameter accessibility coefficient (positive βMA(A), n = 655).]

all
positive βMA(A)
W (%) Inline graphic(%) W (%) Inline graphic(%)
climate 100 ± 0.3 28.5 ± 16.3 100 ± 0.4 22.4 ± 12.8
100 (91.2; 100) 25.8 (1.5; 80.9) 100 (91.2; 100) 20.5 (1.5; 64.1)
accessibility 91.4 ± 20.5 5.8 ± 8.9 93.2 ± 18.5 8.9 ± 9.8
100 (26.9; 100) 0.7 (0; 51) 100 (26.9; 100) 5.4 (0; 51)