Skip to main content
. 2010 Jun;17(6):853–868. doi: 10.1089/cmb.2008.0023

Table 2.

Polynomial Dynamical Systems Approach

  TP FP TN FN TPR FPR ACC PPV
SSD Net1 12 34 113 10 .5454 .231 .7396 .261
Quantile, 5 states Net1 9 49 98 13 .4090 .333 .6331 .155
Interval, 5 states Net1 7 46 101 15 .3181 .313 .6390 .132
SSD Net2 3 5 14 3 .5 .263 .68 .375
Quantile, 7 states Net2 5 13 6 1 .83 .684 .44 .277
Interval, 7 states Net2 4 11 8 2 .66 .579 .48 .266
SSD Net3 4 7 12 2 .66 .368 .64 .364
Quantile, 7 states Net3 5 13 6 1 .83 .684 .44 .277
Interval, 7 states Net3 5 12 7 1 .83 .632 .48 .294
SSD Net4 7 20 69 4 .63 .225 .76 .259
Quantile, 11 states Net4 10 49 40 1 .90 .551 .50 .169
Interval, 11 states Net4 6 34 55 5 .54 .382 .61 .15

The first four columns are the four entries in the confusion matrix.