Skip to main content
. 2011 Oct 28;2:285. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2011.00285

Table 1.

Group comparisons (Experiment 1).

Bin (ms) Phonological Semantic
Ratio (high lit.) Ratio (low lit.) Statistic (t1 df = 72; t2 df = 68) Ratio (high lit.) Ratio (low lit.) Statistic (t1 df = 72; t2 df = 68)
Baseline (0–99) 0.51 0.52 t1 = 0.16, p > 0.1 0.51 0.48 t1 = 1.61, p > 0.1
t2 = 0.22, p > 0.1 t2 = 2.18, p = 0.033
100−199 0.53 0.52 t1 = 0.32, p > 0.1 0.52 0.48 t1 = 1.49, p > 0.1
t2 = 0.68, p > 0.1 t2 = 2.09, p = 0.040
200−299 0.57 0.52 t1 = 1.80, p = 0.076 0.51 0.49 t1 = 0.75, p > 0.1
t2 = 1.45, p > 0.1 t2 = 1.45, p > 0.1
300−399 0.60 0.53 t1 = 2.57, p = 0.012 0.52 0.50 t1 = 0.75, p > 0.1
t2 = 2.05, p = 0.044 t2 = 1.45, p > 0.1
400−499 0.61 0.52 t1 = 3.26, p = 0.002 0.56 0.52 t1 = 1.73, p = 0.089
t2 = 2.14, p = 0.036 t2 = 2.01, p = 0.049
500−599 0.58 0.51 t1 = 2.50, p = 0.015 0.61 0.53 t1 = 3.73, p < 0.001
t2 = 1.59, p > 0.1 t2 = 3.28, p = 0.002
600−699 0.54 0.51 t1 = 1.36, p > 0.1 0.65 0.53 t1 = 5.27, p < 0.001
t2 = 0.92, p > 0.1 t2 = 4.96, p < 0.001
700−799 0.52 0.51 t1 = 0.18, p > 0.1 0.70 0.55 t1 = 6.03, p < 0.001
t2 = 0.13, p > 0.1 t2 = 6.36, p < 0.001