Table 2.
Lesion-containing duplex | Relative incision efficiency | ΔTm (°C) | Stacking interaction (kcal/mol) | Unpaired partner base | ΔIH (flanking base pairs) | Adduct topology |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
B[a]P Full | 111 ± 4 | −11.9 | −25.5 | Yes | 784 | Rigid, more aromatic rings |
PhIP Full | 100 ± 5 | −10.6 | −19.4 | Yes | 209 | Mobile phenyl and methyl groups |
PhIP Del | 16 ± 5 | 2.7 | −22.4 | No | 257 | Mobile phenyl and methyl groups |
B[a]P Del | 0 | 18.9 | −27.9 | No | 41 | Rigid, more aromatic rings |
aThe relative incision efficiencies are the same as shown in Figure 4 at 30 min of incubation. ΔTm values are the same as shown in Figure 2B. For each modified DNA duplex, ΔIH is the trajectory summed IH values of both G:C base pairs flanking the lesion minus the trajectory summed IH values of the G16:C7 and G18:C5 base pairs in the unmodified duplex, and was obtained as described in the Supplementary Data. Stacking interaction energies are the mean values of the vdW interaction energies shown in Figure 7A.