Table 2.
Amino acid and nucleotide comparison of highly represented putative mRNAs
| Putative mRNAs | Organism | KEGG annotation | Base pairs/ AA | Prog | ID (%) | Len (%) | NCBI nt/nr best specific hit |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 42 003 | Phaeodactylum | Hypothetical protein (pti:PHATRDRAFT_37403) | 324 | blastn | 99 | 96 | Uncultured organism 28S rRNA |
| 107 | blastp | 90 | 84 | Senescence-associated protein | |||
| 19 678 | Ostreococcus | Predicted protein (olu:OSTLU_9775) | 264 | blastn | 99 | 99 | Uncultured organism 28S rRNA |
| 88 | blastp | 90 | 102 | Senescence-associated protein | |||
| 13 880 | Chlamydomonas | Hypothetical protein (cre:CHLREDRAFT_155068) | 264 | blastn | 100 | 88 | Uncultured organism 28S rRNA |
| 87 | blastp | 26 | 30 | Unknown protein (Glycine max) |
The blastn and blastp matches are shown for the three most abundant putative mRNA transcripts, which accounted together for (75 561/904 042)= 8.36% of total putative mRNA. AA, amino acids; Prog, program; ID, identity of best match; Len, length of alignment to best match.