Skip to main content
. 2011 Sep 21;76(21):8986–8998. doi: 10.1021/jo201715x

Table 1. Optimization of the Reaction Conditions with Acroleina.

graphic file with name jo-2011-01715x_0004.jpg

entry catalytic mixb solvent time temp GC–MS responsec ratio 4a:5j
1 7a/8a/9 DMF 24 h rt 80 1:2
2 7a/8a/9 MeCN 24 h rt 85 1:2
3 7a/8a/9 ethanol 24 h rt <1 1:2
4 7b/8a/9 MeCN 24 h rt 77 1:2
5 7a/8b/9 MeCN 24 h rt <1 1:2
6 7a/8a/air MeCN 24 h rt 81 1:2
7 7a/8a/9 MeCN 0.5 h 100 °C 65 1:2
8 7a/8a/9 MeCN 24 h rt 66 2:1
9 7a/8a/9 MeCN 24 h rt 60 5:1
a

All reactions were carried out with acrolein (4a) and p-tolylboronic acid (5j), on a 1 mmol scale with Pd(II) catalyst (0.02 mmol), ligand (0.024 mmol), reoxidant (p-bzq, 1 mmol or air), and solvent (2 mL) for the time and temperature indicated.

b

Combination of Pd(II) catalyst, ligand, and reoxidant, consisting of either Pd(OAc)2 (7a) or Pd(OCOCF3)2 (7b), dmphen (8a) or dppp (8b), and p-bzq (9) or air as indicated.

c

Naphthalene was added to each reaction and the GC–MS response was calculated according to (peak area of 6j/naphthalene peak area) × (cnaphthalene/c4a or 5j) × 100. The amount of homocoupled product was <5%. No double arylated Heck product was detected.