Table 4.
Evaluations for 2003 compared with 1997 ratings prior to the described course and the university average
2003 course evaluation | n | 2003 avga | 1997 avgb | University avgc | |||||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Unacceptable | <> | Excellent | |||||||||||
1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | |||||||||
LECTURES | |||||||||||||
Stimulation of independent thinking | 9% | 27% | 64% | 56 | 4.6 | 3.6 | 4.2 | ||||||
Clear presentation of subject matter | 11% | 89% | 56 | 4.9 | 3.6 | 4.2 | |||||||
Overall quality of lectures | 21% | 79% | 56 | 4.8 | 3.6 | 4.2 | |||||||
LABORATORIES | |||||||||||||
Usefulness to lectures and readings | 2% | 98% | 55 | 5.0 | 4.3 | 3.8 | |||||||
Instructor's organization and guidance | 5% | 95% | 55 | 4.9 | 4.1 | 4.0 | |||||||
Overall quality of laboratories | 100% | 55 | 5.0 | 4.2 | 3.9 | ||||||||
READINGS: | |||||||||||||
Stimulation of independent thinking | 33% | 67% | 12 | 4.7 | 3.7 | 4.1 | |||||||
Clear presentation of subject matter | 17% | 83% | 12 | 4.8 | 3.8 | 4.0 | |||||||
Overall quality of readings | 27% | 73% | 11 | 4.7 | 3.7 | 4.1 | |||||||
PAPERS, REPORTS: | |||||||||||||
Guidance in preparation of written work | 2% | 16% | 24% | 58% | 55 | 4.4 | 4.0 | 3.9 | |||||
Comments in response to written work | 21% | 36% | 43% | 53 | 4.2 | 3.7 | 4.0 | ||||||
Overall value of papers, reports | 2% | 4% | 37% | 57% | 54 | 4.5 | 4.0 | 4.0 | |||||
GENERAL: | |||||||||||||
Contribution to knowledge of subject | 2% | 21% | 77% | 56 | 4.8 | 4.3 | 4.4 | ||||||
Contribution to critical evaluation | 2% | 29% | 70% | 56 | 4.7 | 4.3 | 4.3 | ||||||
Contribution to interest in subject | 5% | 32% | 63% | 56 | 4.6 | 4.1 | 4.2 | ||||||
Overall quality of the course | 13% | 88% | 56 | 4.9 | 4.2 | 4.3 |
Course enrollment = 57. Evaluations returned = 56. Response = 98%
Course enrollment = 54. Evaluations returned = 50. Response = 93%
Total enrollment = 17,235. Evaluations returned = 12,007. Response =70%