Skip to main content
. 2004 Spring;3(1):31–48. doi: 10.1187/cbe.03-08-0006

Table 4.

Evaluations for 2003 compared with 1997 ratings prior to the described course and the university average

2003 course evaluation n 2003 avga 1997 avgb University avgc
Unacceptable <> Excellent
1 2 3 4 5
LECTURES
    Stimulation of independent thinking 9% 27% 64% 56 4.6 3.6 4.2
    Clear presentation of subject matter 11% 89% 56 4.9 3.6 4.2
    Overall quality of lectures 21% 79% 56 4.8 3.6 4.2
LABORATORIES
    Usefulness to lectures and readings 2% 98% 55 5.0 4.3 3.8
    Instructor's organization and guidance 5% 95% 55 4.9 4.1 4.0
    Overall quality of laboratories 100% 55 5.0 4.2 3.9
READINGS:
    Stimulation of independent thinking 33% 67% 12 4.7 3.7 4.1
    Clear presentation of subject matter 17% 83% 12 4.8 3.8 4.0
    Overall quality of readings 27% 73% 11 4.7 3.7 4.1
PAPERS, REPORTS:
    Guidance in preparation of written work 2% 16% 24% 58% 55 4.4 4.0 3.9
    Comments in response to written work 21% 36% 43% 53 4.2 3.7 4.0
    Overall value of papers, reports 2% 4% 37% 57% 54 4.5 4.0 4.0
GENERAL:
    Contribution to knowledge of subject 2% 21% 77% 56 4.8 4.3 4.4
    Contribution to critical evaluation 2% 29% 70% 56 4.7 4.3 4.3
    Contribution to interest in subject 5% 32% 63% 56 4.6 4.1 4.2
    Overall quality of the course 13% 88% 56 4.9 4.2 4.3
a

Course enrollment = 57. Evaluations returned = 56. Response = 98%

b

Course enrollment = 54. Evaluations returned = 50. Response = 93%

c

Total enrollment = 17,235. Evaluations returned = 12,007. Response =70%