Skip to main content
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2012 Nov 1.
Published in final edited form as: FEBS J. 2011 Oct 10;278(22):4374–4381. doi: 10.1111/j.1742-4658.2011.08360.x

Table 2.

Data collection and refinement statisticsa

Complex rP4/AMPS D64N/5′-AMP
Wavelength 0.9792 0.9795
Space group P6522 P6522
Unit cell (Å) a = 98.2, c = 107.0 a = 97.9, c = 107.0
Data collection resolution (Å) 50 – 1.35 (1.40 – 1.35) 50 – 1.35 (1.40 – 1.35)
No. of observations 547582 614437
No. of unique reflections 67160 66328
Rmerge(I)b 0.072 (0.607) 0.063 (0.537)
Rmeas(I)b 0.071 (0.697) 0.060 (0.528)
Rp.i.m.(I)b 0.025 (0.247) 0.019 (0.179)
Average I/σ(I) 31.8 (3.2) 39.2 (3.4)
Completeness (%) 100 (99.9) 99.8 (99.8)
Redundancy 8.2 (7.9) 9.3 (9.1)
Mosaicity (deg) 0.2 0.3
Refinement resolution (Å) 50 – 1.35 (1.37 – 1.35) 50 – 1.35 (1.40 – 1.35)
Rcryst 0.138 (0.224) 0.142 (0.214)
Rfreec 0.159 (0.252) 0.159 (0.257)
No. of protein residues 247 247
No. of protein atoms 1938 1928
No. of water molecules 305 251
Average B-factor (Å2)
 Protein 13.2 15.1
 Water 24.6 25.1
 Ligand 13.3 13.9
 Mg+2 7.4 8.6
rmsdd
 Bonds (Å) 0.006 0.006
 Angles (deg) 1.08 1.13
Ramachandran plote
 Favored (%) 98.0 97.6
 Allowed (%) 2.0 2.4
 Outliers (%) 0.0 0.0
Coordinate error (Å)f 0.13 0.14
PDB code 3OCZ 3SF0
a

Values for the outer resolution shell of data are given in parenthesis.

b

Rmerge was calculated using HKL2000; Rmeas and Rp.i.m. were calculated using SCALA [28] after integration with XDS [29].

c

A common set of test reflections (5 %) was used for refinement of all structures.

d

Compared to the parameters of Engh and Huber [30].

e

The Ramachandran plot was generated with RAMPAGE [31].

f

Maximum likelihood-based coordinate error estimate.