. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2013 Apr 1.

Published in final edited form as: Int J Geriatr Psychiatry. 2011 May 10;27(4):382–393. doi: 10.1002/gps.2730

TABLE 3.

Marginal Effects of a .10 Increment in HUI-III Score on Institutional Service Use When Caregiver Burden Scores Are Held Constant at Different Values¹

		Marginal Effect			Marginal Effect
Caregiver Distress Score			Beck Depression Inventory
Value	0	−.298^**	Value	0	−.279^**
	5	−.222^**		5	−.161^*
	10	−.146^*		10	−.043
	15	−.069		15	.074
	20	.007		20	.192
	25	.083		25	.309^#
	30	.158		30	.427^#
	35	.235		35	.545^*
	40	.311		40	.662^*
	45	.388		45	.780^*
Burden Interview Score			Caregiver Activity Survey
Value	0	−.292^*	Value	0	−.273^*
	5	−.272^*		5	−.224^*
	10	−.252^*		10	−.177^*
	15	−.231^*		15	−.128^#
	20	−.211^*		20	−.080
	25	−.191^*		25	−.032
	30	−.171^*		30	.016
	35	−.151^*		35	.064
	40	−.131^#		40	.112
	45	−.111		45	.160
	50	−.091		50	.209
	55	−.071		55	.257
	60	−.050
	65	−.030
	70	−.101
	75	.010
	80	.030

Derived using the MARGINS command in Stata 11.0 based on random effects regressions reported in Table 2. Marginal effects were computed at 5 unit intervals for each caregiver burden measure used.

|z|

p<.10,

p<.05,

^**

p<.01,

^***

p<.001