. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2011 Oct 31.

Published in final edited form as: Int Urogynecol J. 2011 May 13;22(9):1151–1157. doi: 10.1007/s00192-011-1444-x

Table 3.

Proportional odds repeated measures regression analysis of factors independently associated with decreases in liquid fecal incontinence frequency among overweight and obese women with urinary incontinence across all visits

	Women with FISI Scores >0 at baseline, n=163
Model variable	OR (95% confidence interval)^a	p value
Visit	1.15 (0.97–1.37)	0.11
Clinic	0.92 (0.49–1.76)	0.81
Age (5 years increments)	0.98 (0.86–1.12)	0.75
White race/ethnicity	0.63 (0.31–1.28)	0.20
Baseline weight (kg)	1.00 (0.93–1.07)	0.97
Change in weight from baseline (kg)	1.23 (1.08–1.40)	0.001
Urinary incontinent episodes at baseline	1.00 (0.99–1.01)	0.65
Increased fiber intake from baseline (10 g/day)	1.18 (1.00–1.40)	0.05
Decreased AUA symptom index score from baseline	1.07 (1.02–1.08)	0.004

ORs are adjusted for clinic site and account for clustering within intervention groups

FISI Fecal Incontinence Severity Index, AUA American Urologic Association, OR odds ratio