Skip to main content
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2013 Jan 1.
Published in final edited form as: Cell Signal. 2011 Sep 8;24(1):181–188. doi: 10.1016/j.cellsig.2011.08.021

Fig. 5. Effect of IBMX on ILE86TER and ILE86TER/GCAPko rods.

Fig. 5

A, Mean responses averaged from 18 ILE86TER rods to responses of 20 ms flashes of the following intensities (in photons µm2): 17, 43, 159, 453, and 1120. Same traces as in Fig. 4B. B, Mean responses averaged from 9 ILE86TER rods in presence of 100 µM IBMX to responses of 20 ms flashes of same intensities as in A. C, Mean responses averaged from 14 ILE86TER/GCAP−/− rods to responses of 20 ms flashes of same intensities as in A and B. D, Mean responses averaged from 11 ILE86TER/GCAP−/− rods in presence of 100 µM IBMX to responses of 20 ms flashes of the following intensities (in photons µm2): 17, 43, 159, 453, and 646.