Skip to main content
. 2011 Aug 27;89(3):887–917. doi: 10.1007/s11192-011-0484-9

Table 11.

Robustness check: the determinants of inefficiency scores—double bootstrap procedure, DEA 3 input 2 output

Variables (1) Bias-adjusted coefficients 95% Bootstrap confidence intervals (2) Bias-adjusted coefficients 95% Bootstrap confidence intervals (3) Bias-adjusted coefficients 95% Bootstrap confidence intervals
Low High Low High Low High
GDPn,t −0.0005 −0.00119 0.00020 0.0003 −0.00048 0.00084 0.0003 −0.00038 0.00088
nofaci,t −0.0099*** −0.01638 −0.00328 −0.0099*** −0.01673 −0.00322 −0.0075*** −0.01391 −0.00119
medi −0.1678*** −0.22174 −0.10921 −0.1192*** −0.17812 −0.05848 −0.1218*** −0.17899 −0.06505
yearfoundi 0.0003*** 0.00019 0.00049 0.0007*** 0.00052 0.00093 0.0006*** 0.00045 0.00086
Rev_corei,t 0.0109*** 0.00809 0.01365 0.0118*** 0.00896 0.01461
Womeni,t −0.0024* −0.00462 0.00003
Obs 1295 971 919

* Value of zero does not fall within 90% confidence interval, ** Value of zero does not fall within 95% confidence interval, *** Value of zero does not fall within 99% confidence interval. Confidence intervals obtained from 1000 bootstraping interactions

Constants are not reported. Year and country dummies included in all models

Source Own calculations