Skip to main content
. 2011 Sep 13;137(12):1773–1783. doi: 10.1007/s00432-011-1055-4

Table 2.

Multivariate proportional hazards analyses for the risk of recurrence on selected peak clusters, before (model 1, subpopulation) and after (model 3, total study population) adjustment for relevant clinical parameters, and on relevant clinical parameters solely (model 2, total study population)

Parameter Model 1—peak clusters Model 2—clinical parameters Model 3—combined
HR (95% CI) P value HR (95% CI) P value HR (95% CI) P value
Peak cluster
 m/z 3073 3.17 (2.03–4.96) <0.001 2.48 (1.78–3.48) <0.001
 m/z 3274 10.18 (1.99–52.01) 0.005 11.71 (2.05–66.90) 0.006
 m/z 4405 0.02 (0.01–0.25) 0.003 0.01 (0.01–0.17) 0.001
 m/z 7973 0.05 (0.01–0.48) 0.010 0.24 (0.03–1.78) 0.160
Treatment
 CONV 1 1
 HD 1.59 (0.86–2.95) 0.140 2.48 (1.24–4.98) 0.011
Age
 <40 years 1 1
 ≥40 years 0.44 (0.22–0.88) 0.021 0.35 (0.16–0.74) 0.006
No. of LN+
 ≥10 1 1
 4–9 0.44 (0.23–0.84) 0.012 0.37 (0.19–0.72) 0.003
PR status
 PR(−) 1 1
 PR(+) 0.40 (0.22–0.73) 0.003 0.28 (0.14–0.55) < 0.001

CONV conventional dose arm, HD high-dose arm, LN+ number of positive lymph nodes, PR progesterone receptor status positive (+) and negative (−)