Table 4.

Changes in the IMB and Social Influence Composite Index Measures from Baseline to 3-Month Post-Intervention Assessment by Intervention Conditions.^a

	All Three Month Post-Intervention Survey Participants		Original Participants Followed Up at Three Month Post-Intervention
	Intervention	Control	Intervention	Control
	(N=360)b	(N=354)b	(N=235)b	(N=210)b
IMB composite index measures
HIV information	0.89**	−0.10	1.11**	0.06
Prevention intentions (stable)	0.59*	0.61**	0.59**	0.69**
Prevention intentions (non-stable)	0.22	0.54*	0.25	0.67**
Negative attitude toward condom	−2.05**	−1.52**	−1.70**	−1.79**
Self-efficacy (stable)	1.15	1.90**	1.20*	1.74*
Self-efficacy (non-stable)	1.64**	2.57**	1.76**	2.80**
Social influence composite index measures
Traditional gender norms	−3.20**	−2.11**	−4.04**	−2.66**
Peer discussion of prevention	2.07**	1.39**	2.06**	1.61**
Peer support for condom use (stable)	1.66**	0.88**	1.63**	1.10*
Peer support for condom use (non stable)	1.64**	1.37**	1.63**	1.70**
Lack of relationship power	−1.82**	−1.31**	−1.98**	−1.66**
Venue support	5.15**	4.45*	5.00**	4.42*

Notes:

^aResults are based on svy methods (survey design-based methods) in STATA, which correct intra-cluster (establishment) correlations in the significance tests of the cross-survey differences.

^bSample size varies slightly among the different measures because of missing values.

^*p<0.05;

^**p<0.01