Skip to main content
. 2011 Apr 20;96(7):2136–2145. doi: 10.1210/jc.2010-2813

Table 1.

Subject characteristics by glucose tolerance group

NGT (1), n = 101 IGT (2), n = 50 T2DM (3), n = 23 OB-T1DM (4), n = 14 P, ANOVA P, post hoc
1 vs. 2 1 vs. 3 1 vs. 4 2 vs. 3 2 vs. 4 3 vs. 4
Age (yr) 14.8 ± 0.2 14.7 ± 0.3 15.0 ± 0.4 14.1 ± 1.6 0.60
Sex (% male) 38 32 43 36 0.81
Tanner stage (% IV–V) 88 88 87 79 0.29
Race (% African-American, White, biracial) 44, 51, 5 36, 62, 2 43, 57, 0 36, 64, 0 0.91
BMI (kg/m2) 34.7 ± 0.6 36.5 ± 0.9 35.9 ± 1.1 30.6 ± 1.4 0.01 NS NS 0.10 NS 0.01 0.06
BMI percentile 97.7 ± 0.2 98.7 ± 0.2 98.8 ± 0.1 95.7 ± 1.0 <0.001 0.04 NS 0.01 NS <0.001 <0.001
% overweight/% obese 10/90 2/98 0/100 29/71
Fat mass (kg) 40.7 ± 1.4 43.0 ± 1.7 40.1 ± 2.1 32.9 ± 3.1 0.07
FFM (kg) 50.5 ± 1.0 51.3 ± 1.4 53.3 ± 2.4 46.3 ± 2.6 0.22
Total body fat (%) 42.8 ± 0.8 44.1 ± 0.7 42.1 ± 1.4 39.9 ± 2.2 0.21
HbA1C (%) 5.4 ± 0.04 5.4 ± 0.06 6.6 ± 0.14 6.3 ± 0.29 <0.001 NS <0.001 <0.001 <0.001 <0.001 NS

NS, Not significant.