Table 3. Regressions between log(Chla) and log(TN) for Different Coastal Areas and Trajectory Analyses for Temporal Departures from Linear Relationshipa.
linear regression log(Chla)–log(TN) |
trajectory analysis |
||||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
region | area | short name | no. of years | relationship | RMSE | p | RMSE | χ2 | p |
Chesapeake Bay | Choptank | CHO | 23 | –1.44 + 0.87x | 0.24 | 0.0034 | 0.17 | 19.31 | <0.0001 |
Chesapeake Bay | James River | JMS | 23 | 1.37 + 0.12x | 0.22 | 0.6646 | 0.18 | 7.61 | 0.0236 |
Chesapeake Bay | Mainstem mesohaline | MH | 18 | –0.93 + 0.79x | 0.14 | 0.0303 | 0.13 | 6.46 | 0.0412 |
Chesapeake Bay | Mainstem polyhaline | PH | 18 | –2.36 + 1.22x | 0.22 | 0.0409 | 0.19 | 8.87 | 0.0124 |
Chesapeake Bay | Patuxent | PAX | 21 | 0.30 + 0.54x | 0.25 | 0.2233 | 0.21 | 7.50 | 0.0237 |
Chesapeake Bay | Potomac | POT | 23 | 0.16 + 0.50x | 0.19 | 0.0484 | 0.17 | 8.21 | 0.0175 |
Chesapeake Bay | Rappahannock | RPP | 23 | 1.19 + 0.23x | 0.26 | 0.5519 | 0.17 | 15.54 | 0.0005 |
Denmark coast | Flensborg Fjord | FLF | 21 | 0.46 + 0.22x | 0.17 | 0.2019 | 0.14 | 11.98 | 0.0025 |
Denmark coast | Horsens Fjord | HOF | 26 | 1.85 + –0.17x | 0.24 | 0.4580 | 0.31 | 3.24 | 0.1920 |
Denmark coast | Køge Bay | KØB | 21 | –3.71 + 1.30x | 0.15 | 0.0002 | 0.13 | 7.88 | 0.0197 |
Denmark coast | Limfjorden | LIM | 25 | –0.84 + 0.61x | 0.28 | 0.0374 | 0.24 | 9.93 | 0.0067 |
Denmark coast | Nissum Bredning | NIB | 25 | 0.62 + 0.20x | 0.24 | 0.2645 | 0.26 | 5.00 | 0.0802 |
Denmark coast | Odense Fjord | ODF | 30 | 0.85 + 0.12x | 0.20 | 0.4680 | 0.26 | 21.57 | <0.0001 |
Denmark coast | Roskilde Fjord | ROF | 29 | –0.11 + 0.37x | 0.17 | 0.0679 | 0.23 | 1.01 | 0.5893 |
Denmark coast | Skive Fjord | SKF | 25 | –2.67 + 1.09x | 0.20 | <0.0001 | 0.20 | 17.21 | 0.0002 |
Denmark coast | Sydfynske Øhav | SFØ | 29 | 0.78 + –0.03x | 0.21 | 0.9148 | 0.16 | 22.36 | <0.0001 |
Denmark coast | Århus Bay | ÅRB | 25 | 1.61 + –0.28x | 0.23 | 0.5766 | 0.22 | 5.76 | 0.0554 |
Tampa Bay | Hillsborough Bay | HB | 26 | –0.50 + 0.73x | 0.25 | 0.0046 | 0.19 | 21.81 | <0.0001 |
Tampa Bay | Lower Tampa Bay | LTB | 26 | 0.43 + 0.24x | 0.23 | 0.1956 | 0.20 | 11.30 | 0.0038 |
Tampa Bay | Middle Tampa Bay | MTB | 26 | –0.25 + 0.56x | 0.28 | 0.0387 | 0.19 | 35.61 | <0.0001 |
Tampa Bay | Old Tampa Bay | OTB | 26 | 1.74 + 0.08x | 0.20 | 0.6882 | 0.15 | 23.56 | <0.0001 |
Wadden Sea | Dantziggat | DG | 26 | 0.10 + 0.56x | 0.27 | 0.0880 | 0.24 | 13.43 | 0.0012 |
Wadden Sea | Doove Balg | DB | 25 | 1.19 + 0.25x | 0.29 | 0.4630 | 0.30 | 3.16 | 0.2063 |
Wadden Sea | Huibertgat | HG | 29 | –1.05 + 0.64x | 0.18 | <0.0000 | 0.19 | 1.93 | 0.3872 |
Wadden Sea | Lauwers | LW | 29 | 0.03 + 0.52x | 0.23 | 0.0875 | 0.24 | 0.71 | 0.7062 |
Wadden Sea | Marsdiep | MD | 30 | 0.52 + 0.31x | 0.18 | 0.0583 | 0.17 | 2.90 | 0.2276 |
Wadden Sea | Vliestroom | VS | 29 | 0.78 + 0.29x | 0.20 | 0.1102 | 0.19 | 3.84 | 0.1499 |
Wadden Sea | Zoutkamperlaag | ZK | 29 | –0.44 + 0.64x | 0.26 | 0.0486 | 0.22 | 5.98 | 0.0515 |
Linear relationship, residual mean square error (RMSE, weighted) and significance level (p) refer to the linear regression of log(Chla) vs. log(TN). Temporal departures from the linear relationship were investigated by means of GAM; RMSE was calculated as the deviance per observation (unweighted), χ2 and p derive from likelihood ratio test statistics. Number of observations is equal to the number of years. Significant relationships (p < 0.05) are highlighted in bold.