. 2011 Sep 29;45(21):9122–9132. doi: 10.1021/es202351y

Table 4. Analysis of Variance from Analyzing Residuals from Region-Specific Relationships (log(Chla)–log(TN) Relationship in Figure 11C) vs. log(TP) with an Intercept Specific to the Coastal Ecosystem, i.e., Residual = α_ecosystem + β × log(TP)^a.

		TP-dependent slope			ecosystem-specific intercept
region	df_error	β	F	p	df_ecosystem	F	p
Chesapeake Bay	141	–0.30	4.13	0.0440	7	5.36	<0.0001
Denmark coast	245	–0.07	2.32	0.1289	10	24.07	<0.0001
Tampa Bay	99	0.24	13.46	0.0004	4	17.42	<0.0001
Wadden Sea	184	–0.21	10.45	0.0015	7	31.14	<0.0001

Residuals were weighted by the inverse variance of the annual Chla means.

Table 4. Analysis of Variance from Analyzing Residuals from Region-Specific Relationships (log(Chla)–log(TN) Relationship in Figure 11C) vs. log(TP) with an Intercept Specific to the Coastal Ecosystem, i.e., Residual = αecosystem + β × log(TP)a.