Table 1.

Simulations Generating the Retention Profiles in Figures 3–5 Were Generated with the Following Parameter Values Consistent with Different Mechanisms and Processes

Curve Name	Population Size	Network Size	Fitness Penalty	Pr(Link Loss)	Pr(Gene Loss)	SF Allowed	Pr(Neo Link)	Neo Fitness Adv.
3A	1,000	4	0.0	0.005	0.0001	No	0.0	0.0
3B	1,000	4	0.4	0.01	0.0001	No	0.0	0.0
3C	1,000	4	0.4	0.005	0.0001	No	0.0	0.0
3D	1,000	4	0.4	0.005	0.001	No	0.0	0.0
3E	1,000	4	0.4	0.00001	0.0001	No	0.0	0.0
3F	1,000	4	0.4	0.01	0.0001	Yes	0.0	0.0
3G	1,000	4	0.4	0.005	0.0001	Yes	0.0	0.0
3H	1,000	4	0.4	0.005	0.001	Yes	0.0	0.0
3I	1,000	4	0.0	0.005	0.0001	Yes	0.0	0.0
3J	1,000	4	0.4	0.00001	0.0001	Yes	0.0	0.0
3K	1,000	4	0.0	0.005	0.0001	No	0.0001	0.05
3L	1,000	4	0.0	0.005	0.0001	No	0.0001	0.2
3M	1,000	4	0.4	0.005	0.0001	No	0.0001	0.05
3N	1,000	4	0.4	0.005	0.0001	No	0.0001	0.2
4A	1,000	4	0.0	0.005	0.0001	No	0.0	0.0
4B	100	4	0.0	0.005	0.0001	No	0.0	0.0
4C	1,000	4	0.4	0.005	0.0001	No	0.0	0.0
4D	100	4	0.4	0.005	0.0001	No	0.0	0.0
5A	1,000	3	0.4	0.005	0.0001	No	0.0	0.0
5B	1,000	4	0.4	0.005	0.0001	No	0.0	0.0
5C	1,000	5	0.4	0.005	0.0001	No	0.0	0.0

NOTE.—Neo Fitness Adv., fitness advantage of a neofunctionalized individual; SF, subfunctionalization.