Skip to main content
. 2011 Oct 20;7:1441–1448. doi: 10.3762/bjoc.7.168

Table 2.

Optimization of the elimination protocol and formation of vinyl azide 4a under batch conditions (entries 1–7) and as a flow protocol (entry 8).

graphic file with name Beilstein_J_Org_Chem-07-1441-i014.jpg

entry base solvent T [°C] t [h] yielda

1 1.5 equiv KOt-Bu Et2O rt 2 95%
2 1.5 equiv KOt-Bu CH2Cl2 rt 2 decomposition
3 5 equiv K2CO3 CH2Cl2 rt 18 5%
4b 5 equiv K2CO3 CH2Cl2 60 18 23%
5 2.5 equiv DIPEAc DMF 60 2 92%
6 2 equiv DBU CH2Cl2 rt 1.5 92%
7 2 equiv PS–DBUd CH2Cl2 rt 1.5 93%
8e 2 equiv PS–DBU CH2Cl2 rt 0.04 mL/min complete transformation

aIsolated yields; bReaction was carried out in a microwave-compatible tube heated in an oil bath, cDIPEA = diisopropylethyl amine; dPS–DBU = polystyrene-bound 1,8-diaza-[5.4.0]bicyclo-7-undecene (8); eFlow process: Glass reactor (12 cm length and 8.5 mm internal diameter) filled with polymer 8 (0.5 g; theoretical loading = 1.15 mmol/g).