Skip to main content
. 2011 Jul 28;10(10):M111.007922. doi: 10.1074/mcp.M111.007922

Table II. Reproducibility evaluation based on selected peaks.

Peak No.a RPLC
HILIC
tR m/z S.D. tRb RSDc tR m/z S.D. tRb RSDc
1 2.1 144.10 0.19 4.8% 20.3 144.10 0.21 11.4%
2 8.4 376.14 0.08 9.8% \ \ \
3 9.0 288.28 0.13 16.7% 15.1 288.28 0.35 11.4%
4 10.8 286.19 0.23 5.2% 19.2 286.19 0.46 10.8%
5 12.8 314.23 0.41 10.6% \ \ \ \
6 14.9 274.26 0.38 14.2% \ \ \ \
7 \ \ \ \ 2.5 284.28 0.31 9.8%
8 \ \ \ \ 10.2 312.11 0.69 19.8%
9 \ \ \ \ 17.9 407.77 0.33 8.4%

a Peak No. refers to the corresponding peaks in Fig. 1.

b S.D. tR: standard deviation of retention times in six QC samples.

c RSD: relative stand deviation of peak areas in six QC samples.