Skip to main content
. 2011 Aug 24;96(11):E1756–E1760. doi: 10.1210/jc.2011-0615

Table 1.

Multiple logistic regression analysis of 115 males and females for regional fat predictors of insulin resistance (IR group)

Model Standardized OR 95% CI P valuea
Model 1
    SAT (Z-score) 0.58 0.35–0.98 0.04
    Male sex 1.56 0.62–3.89 0.34
    BMI (kg/m2) 1.19 1.00–1.42 0.05
Model 2
    VAT (Z-score) 1.80 1.03–3.15 0.04
    Male sex 1.39 0.54–3.59 0.49
    BMI (kg/m2) 1.01 0.87–1.17 0.89
Model 3
    %VAT (Z-score) 1.88 1.10–3.23 0.02
    Male sex 1.15 0.42–3.15 0.78
    BMI (kg/m2) 1.07 0.93–1.22 0.36
Model 4
    Thigh (Z-score) 0.41 0.22–0.78 0.006b
    Male sex 0.59 0.16–2.09 0.41
    BMI (kg/m2) 1.34 1.08–1.65 0.007
Model 5
    VAT (Z-score) 1.77 1.04–3.02 0.04
    SAT (Z-score) 0.56 0.34–0.94 0.03
    Male sex 0.89 0.31–2.52 0.83
    BMI (kg/m2) 1.14 0.95–1.36 0.16
a

Interaction term for sex-regional fat mass term did not alter results, was not statistically significant, and was thus removed from final models.

b

P < 0.05 after adjustment for VAT, SAT, male sex, and BMI.