Table 3.
Informant 1 | Informant 2 | |||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Item | Mean | SD | Mean | SD | t | p | r | p of r |
SIS1 | 1.80 | 0.56 | 1.80 | 0.50 | 0.000 | 1.000 | 0.733 | 0.000** |
SIS2 | 1.03 | 0.66 | 0.97 | 0.72 | 0.664 | 0.509 | 0.424 | 0.000** |
SIS3 | 0.88 | 0.60 | 1.03 | 0.58 | −2.193 | 0.032* | 0.545 | 0.000** |
SIS4 | 1.11 | 0.88 | 1.14 | 0.91 | −0.270 | 0.788 | 0.482 | 0.000** |
SIS5 | 0.53 | 0.79 | 0.48 | 0.75 | 0.536 | 0.594 | 0.600 | 0.000** |
SIS6 | 0.76 | 0.82 | 0.76 | 0.79 | 0.000 | 1.000 | 0.573 | 0.000** |
SIS7 | 0.53 | 0.84 | 0.52 | 0.85 | 0.148 | 0.883 | 0.516 | 0.000** |
SIS8 | 0.68 | 0.75 | 0.74 | 0.81 | −0.600 | 0.551 | 0.447 | 0.000** |
SIS total | 7.30 | 2.70 | 7.44 | 2.50 | −0.463 | 0.645 | 0.579 | 0.000** |
The significant level was 0.05.
The significant level was 0.001.