Skip to main content
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2011 Nov 2.
Published in final edited form as: Alcohol Clin Exp Res. 2010 Jun 25;34(9):1590–1602. doi: 10.1111/j.1530-0277.2010.01244.x

Figure 2.

Figure 2

Reaction times (± SEM) plotted for each of the six delays for both groups on a.) easy and b.) hard choice trials. FH− (open circles) and FH+ (filled circles). Group differences were seen for both easy and hard choice reaction times [easy choice RT: F (1, 26) = 12.20, p = .002; hard choice RT: F (1, 26) = 4.22, p = .05]. c.) Reaction times (± SEM) on control trials for each group [t(21.1) = −2.61, p = .016]. d.) Summary graph showing easy and hard choices collapsed across the six delays for both groups. * denotes p = .01 between-subjects main effect on reaction time.

HHS Vulnerability Disclosure