Skip to main content
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2013 Feb 1.
Published in final edited form as: Emotion. 2011 Jun 27;12(1):28–32. doi: 10.1037/a0024345

Figure 1. Experimental paradigm and skin conductance responses.

Figure 1

(A) An initial cue indicated whether the trial involved potential shock or not (threat and safe trials, respectively). In the former case, in 33% of the trials, an unpleasant electrical stimulus was administered for 500 ms during the cue-target interval. During the target period, a Stroop stimulus was presented and involved neutral, congruent, and incongruent conditions (for simplicity, not all task phases are displayed; see text). (B) For display purposes, untransformed SCRs were averaged as a function of condition. A robust effect of threat is apparent. The error bars represent the standard error of the mean.