Box 1.
Evaluation of initiatives arising from Our Health, Our Care, Our Say
Initiative | Description of initiative | Description of evaluation |
---|---|---|
Care closer to home demonstration sites | New services in community, aiming to reduce demand on hospitals. Included GPs with special interests, community-based consultant clinics, telephone support. Five demonstration sites in each of six specialities. | Aim: to describe organisation and implementation, impact on access, quality, and costs. Design: interviews with providers and commissioners, postal survey of patients using new services and a limited number of control patients. Compared costs of new services in six sites against national tariff. |
Improving Access to Psychological Therapies | Two demonstration sites based on different approaches to significantly expanding availability of psychological therapies: high volume low intensity or case management. | Aim: to assess organisational implications of the new approaches and whether they are cost-effective and acceptable to patients. Design: cohort study of costs and outcomes for patients in demonstration sites compared with control sites and national datasets; mixed methods study of system impacts; questionnaire and qualitative study of patient experience. |
Individual budgets | Service users allocated budgets according to social care needs that can be used to purchase care, equipment, housing, and employment support. | Aim: to assess implementation, cost-effectiveness, and user experience. Design: randomised controlled trial plus interviews with service users, carers, and staff. |
Information prescriptions | Individualised information in relation to needs. Twenty pilot sites established, providing different forms of information prescription for different types of patients. | Aim: to assess effectiveness and impact on patients and services and to gather learning about implementation. Design: qualitative research with staff; survey of patients, carers, and staff; collection of data about activity and estimates of resources used; action learning events with pilot sites. |
New types of workers | Twenty-eight pilot sites developing a range of new care roles intended to address policy objectives such as patient-centred care, improved access, supporting care at home. | Aim: to support pilot sites to develop new roles and management systems. Design: documentary analysis of pilot proposals and reports; interviews and focus groups with managers, workers, and people using services. |
NHS LifeCheck | Self-assessment tools to help people identify their health behaviour and make changes. Developed around three lifestages: parents of babies; teenagers; mid-life. Pilot sites established for each lifestage. | Aim: to gain feedback about improving the tools and to explore their acceptability to potential user groups. Design: interviews and focus groups with potential users and staff, a survey of young people, and analysis of use of the website for Teen LifeCheck. |
Partnerships for Older People Projects | Twenty-nine pilot sites were established to develop and evaluate innovative partnerships between health, social care, and third sector agencies to promote health and independence of older people. | Aim: to develop explanatory framework to understand most effective approach. Design: documentary analysis; collection of activity data from pilot site; interviews and focus groups with service users; a survey of people before and after accessing a partnership; comparison with routine data about emergency data from non-matched control sites. |
Self-referral to physiotherapy | Six pilot sites allowed patients to refer themselves for physiotherapy rather than needing referral from a doctor. | Aim: to evaluate impact in terms of waiting times, changes in activity and identify uptake by different groups of people. Design: historical and prospective data about activity and waiting times, a minimum data set about patients following introduction of self-referral, and feedback forms from GPs and physiotherapists. |
Social enterprise pathfinders | Twenty-six pathfinder projects to develop organisations providing a range of community health and social services on a social enterprise model. | Aim: to assess success in meeting social enterprise pathfinder goals. Design: mixed methods including interviews, focus groups, workshops, telephone survey of pathfinders, and collection of data on costs. Mainly formative approach. |
Whole System Demonstrator sites | Three primary care trusts designated as demonstrator sites. Implemented integrated health and social care through system redesign. Focus on people with long-term conditions or complex needs supported through assistive technologies. | Aim: To assess impact on service use, patient outcomes, cost-effectiveness, patient, carer and providers experiences, factors associated with successful implementation. Design: large cluster randomised controlled trial with nested qualitative research on users and providers experiences. |