Skip to main content
Springer logoLink to Springer
. 2011 Sep 13;13(6):590–607. doi: 10.1007/s11940-011-0146-5

Autoimmune Neuromuscular Disorders in Childhood

Hugh J McMillan 2, Basil T Darras 1, Peter B Kang 1,
PMCID: PMC3207132  PMID: 21912840

Opinion statement

Autoimmune neuromuscular disorders in childhood include Guillain-Barré syndrome and its variants, chronic inflammatory demyelinating polyradiculoneuropathy (CIDP), juvenile myasthenia gravis (JMG), and juvenile dermatomyositis (JDM), along with other disorders rarely seen in childhood. In general, these diseases have not been studied as extensively as they have been in adults. Thus, treatment protocols for these diseases in pediatrics are often based on adult practice, but despite the similarities in disease processes, the most widely used treatments have different effects in children. For example, some of the side effects of chronic steroid use, including linear growth deceleration, bone demineralization, and chronic weight issues, are more consequential in children than in adults. Although steroids remain a cornerstone of therapy in JDM and are useful in many cases of CIDP and JMG, other immunomodulatory therapies with similar efficacy may be used more frequently in some children to avoid these long-term sequelae. Steroids are less expensive than most other therapies, but chronic steroid therapy in childhood may lead to significant and costly medical complications. Another example is plasma exchange. This treatment modality presents challenges in pediatrics, as younger children require central venous access for this therapy. However, in older children and adolescents, plasma exchange is often feasible via peripheral venous access, making this treatment more accessible than might be expected in this age group. Intravenous immunoglobulin also is beneficial in several of these disorders, but its high cost may present barriers to its use in the future. Newer steroid-sparing immunomodulatory agents, such as azathioprine, tacrolimus, mycophenolate mofetil, and rituximab, have not been studied extensively in children. They show promising results from case reports and retrospective cohort studies, but there is a need for comparative studies looking at their relative efficacy, tolerability, and long-term adverse effects (including secondary malignancy) in children.

Introduction

Childhood autoimmune neuromuscular diseases are a heterogeneous group of acquired inflammatory disorders that result from autoimmune sensitization. The most common ones include Guillain-Barré syndrome, chronic inflammatory demyelinating polyradiculoneuropathy (CIDP), juvenile myasthenia gravis, and juvenile dermatomyositis. Others, such as vasculitic neuropathies, Lambert-Eaton myasthenic syndrome, polymyositis, and overlap myositis, have been reported in children but are rare in this age group.

These diseases share some common elements of immune dysregulation, namely T-cell activation with subsequent antibody and complement deposition in nerve, neuromuscular junction, or muscle (Table 1). Postinfectious molecular mimicry and genetic predispositions have been proposed for some autoimmune disorders, although mechanistic details remain unclear. Treatment of childhood autoimmune disorders is based upon published prospective and retrospective cohort studies, expert opinion, pediatric randomized controlled trials (particularly for Guillain-Barré syndrome and dermatomyositis), and extrapolation of results from adult studies. Early diagnosis and initiation of treatment can significantly reduce long-term morbidity for these diseases.

Table 1.

Antibodies in autoimmune neuromuscular disorders of childhood

Disorder Antibodya
Neuromuscular junction
 Juvenile myasthenia gravis (JMG) Anti-AChR, anti-MuSK, anti-striated muscle
 Lambert-Eaton myasthenic syndrome (LEMS) Anti-VGCC
Muscle
 Dermatomyositis, polymyositis Myositis-specific antibodies
Anti-Jo1, anti-p155, anti-p140
Anti-nuclear antibody (ANA)
Nerve
 Guillain-Barré syndrome
 Acute inflammatory demyelinating polyneuropathy (AIDP) None known
 Acute motor axonal neuropathy (AMAN) Anti-GM1
 Miller-Fisher variant Anti-GQ1b
 Chronic inflammatory demyelinating polyradiculoneuropathy (CIDP) Anti-MAG (rare)

aPositive antibody titers are not always identified in patients with these disorders, so the sensitivity of the specific titer should be considered when interpreting such results

Outcome is often good when aggressive and appropriate therapies are used to treat these disorders, but some of the treatments used have not been studied as rigorously in children as in adults. Further prospective studies of therapies for these diseases in childhood are needed.

Treatment

Guillain-Barré syndrome

  • Guillain-Barré syndrome (GBS) results from a loss of immunologic tolerance wherein autoreactive T lymphocytes, antibodies, and complement damage myelinated peripheral nerves [1]. Two thirds of GBS patients have an antecedent infection in the month prior to onset, fueling the theory of postinfectious molecular mimicry as the basic pathophysiologic mechanism [2]. GBS is uncommon in the first few years of life, but rare cases of neonatal GBS have been reported [3]. GBS is divided into several clinical subgroups: acute inflammatory demyelinating polyradiculoneuropathy (AIDP), Miller-Fisher syndrome (MFS), and acute motor axonal neuropathy (AMAN). Treatment is similar for all forms of GBS.

  • Pediatric and adult GBS patients present with progressive, symmetrical muscle weakness and diminished or absent deep tendon reflexes. Pain is often a prominent symptom, particularly in younger children, with 50% to 80% complaining of severe back, buttock, or limb pain [46, 7••]. Autonomic symptoms, including variability in heart rate, blood pressure, and thermoregulation, occur in 20% to 40% of children, with respiratory failure seen in 16% to 17% [4, 5]. Both autonomic and respiratory complications are less frequent in children than in adults. Children presenting with symptoms suggestive of GBS require close observation because of the possibility of rapidly progressive respiratory weakness, bulbar dysfunction, or autonomic dysfunction.

  • Diagnostic criteria are well established for GBS [8]. In recent years, enhancement and thickening of the nerve roots on MRI imaging of the spine have been used to support the diagnosis, but these findings are not always specific to GBS [9•]. The long-term outcome of childhood GBS is quite favorable, though recovery is sometimes prolonged in the AMAN subtype, compared with AIDP [10]. Young age and rapid symptom progression may heighten the risk of long-term sequelae, but even though over 20% of children experience residual weakness, it rarely results in any functional impairment [4].

  • Early treatment with intravenous immunoglobulin (IVIG) or plasma exchange (PE) is recommended for any child with GBS who has difficulty ambulating [11].

Intravenous immunoglobulin (IVIG)

Two small, randomized pediatric trials have demonstrated the efficacy of early IVIG therapy versus placebo [12, Class II] and versus late IVIG treatment [13, Class II]. In each study, IVIG reduced the time between symptom onset and the patients’ initial and complete recovery [12, 13]. A retrospective study also supports the use of IVIG in pediatric GBS [14, Class IV].

Standard dosage

The total IVIG dose is typically 2 g/kg divided over 2 to 5 days.

Mechanism of action

Multiple actions have been postulated. IVIG has been shown to neutralize the blocking effects of some autoantibodies [15]. IVIG is also thought to downregulate T-cell activity and antibody production.

Side effects

Headache, nausea, vomiting, allergic reactions, and aseptic meningitis may occur. IVIG must be used cautiously in children with cardiac or renal dysfunction. Renal failure has been described in rare cases.

Cost

IVIG is very expensive.

Plasma exchange

PE, also known as plasmapheresis, is an accepted alternative to IVIG therapy in GBS patients. PE appears as efficacious as IVIG in at least five adult randomized controlled trials [16, Class I]. PE has also been shown to improve patient strength and reduce duration of mechanical ventilation more than placebo in adult GBS, although these studies were subject to less rigorous design [11, Class II]. There is one case–control study of PE in childhood GBS [17, Class III]. No pediatric randomized controlled trial has studied the efficacy or tolerability of PE in this population. On the basis of the strong evidence of equal efficacy of IVIG and PE for adult GBS patients, either therapy can be offered to pediatric GBS patients. The choice between the two treatments in a particular case may be influenced by technical feasibility, side effect profile, and cost.

Mechanism of action

PE is thought to wash out or remove autoantibodies and inflammatory cytokines.

Main side effects

Potential short-term side effects include hypotension, electrolyte imbalance, or coagulopathy. Chronic PE frequently causes anemia, and it also may cause hypocalcemia and hypogammaglobulinemia (with increased susceptibility to infection) [18].

Corticosteroids and other immunosuppressive medications

Corticosteroids are not beneficial in the treatment of GBS [19, Class II]. Given the short, monophasic nature of GBS, there is no role for chronic immunosuppressive medications.

Physical therapy and exercise

Physical therapy is essential in the rehabilitation of children with GBS. This intervention can help a child regain skills during convalescence and may also help prevent the formation of contractures.

Chronic inflammatory demyelinating polyradiculoneuropathy

  • CIDP is distinguished from GBS by the chronic nature of the disease. Children demonstrate either a progressive or relapsing sensorimotor polyneuropathy and/or polyradiculopathy for at least 2 months [20]. Although many CIDP patients exhibit a slow, insidious onset of weakness and sensory loss, up to 16% may exhibit an initial acute onset that mimics GBS [21].

  • CIDP diagnostic criteria are aimed at distinguishing the disorder both from its acute-onset counterpart, GBS, and from hereditary and metabolic neuropathies [20, 22, Class IV]. Diffuse nerve root thickening and gadolinium enhancement on spine MRI were present in 60% of adult CIDP patients in one series [23]. These findings have also been observed in childhood CIDP [24] and can strengthen diagnostic certainty when present, but it should be noted that similar MRI findings may be seen in inherited neuropathies such as Charcot-Marie-Tooth disease [25, Class IV].

  • CIDP may be treated with IVIG, PE, or corticosteroids [26••, Class I].

Diet and lifestyle

Adequate intake of vitamin D and calcium is essential for optimizing bone health and reducing risk of osteoporosis. Recommendations for vitamin D supplementation vary, but a dose of 800 to 1000 IU daily is reasonable. Calcium intake should be optimized primarily from dietary sources.

Growth velocity and weight gain should be closely monitored, particularly in children receiving corticosteroids. These recommendations are relevant to all autoimmune neuromuscular disorders of childhood.

IVIG and PE

Several case series of childhood CIDP have reported IVIG and corticosteroids to be efficacious [24, 2732, Class IV]. PE also appears to be beneficial in some cases of childhood CIDP, though it is less frequently used [24, 28, 31, 32, Class IV]

Numerous randomized trials of adult CIDP have shown IVIG to be superior to placebo [3337, Class I]. PE has also been demonstrated to be superior to placebo in adult CIDP [38]. Other trials demonstrated equal efficacy of IVIG versus PE [39, Class I] or corticosteroids [40, Class I].

Corticosteroids

Corticosteroids appear to be effective in adults [40, Class I] and children [24, 2729, 31, 32, Class IV] with CIDP.

Mechanism of action

Corticosteroids exert a broad immunosuppressive effect; the function and numbers of lymphocytes and monocytes are particularly affected [41].

Main side effects

The numerous side effects of chronic corticosteroid therapy [42] are particularly detrimental to children who are at a critical stage of vertical growth and bone mineral deposition. In rare cases, the initiation of steroids has been linked to hip osteonecrosis. Potential complications from long-term corticosteroid therapy can include decreased linear growth velocity and reduction of final adult height, bone demineralization, weight gain, acne, and behavior problems. Hypertension, hyperglycemia, and cataracts may occur.

Special points

Depending on the severity of the case and the expected duration of treatment, a steroid-sparing drug (e.g., azathioprine) may be started simultaneously, with the goal of reducing the duration of steroid treatment.

Azathioprine

Azathioprine is the most widely used steroid-sparing therapy in childhood CIDP [27, Class IV]. One prospective cohort study of azathioprine in adult CIDP failed to show any definite improvement when this medication was added for patients receiving corticosteroids [43, Class II], but this study may have been too short (9 months) to detect beneficial effects.

Standard dosage

A standard starting dose for azathioprine is 1 mg/kg per day given daily or divided in two doses. The dose may be increased by 0.5 mg/kg per day every 4 weeks to a maximum of 2.5 mg/kg per day. Dose adjustments are needed in renal failure and thiopurine methyltransferase deficiency. Dosing by weight may need to be lower in obese patients who weigh more than the typical adult. A trial of 12 weeks is usually sufficient to determine therapeutic efficacy.

Mechanism of action

Azathioprine antagonizes purine metabolism inhibiting DNA and RNA replication.

Main side effects

Side effects can include somnolence, bone marrow suppression, and reversible hepatitis or pancreatitis. Surveillance blood testing is required. Female patients should be counseled about possible teratogenic effects of this and other immunosuppressants. There have been reports of malignancy associated with chronic azathioprine use [44, Class IV]. The US Food and Drug Administration (FDA) has warned that there is a risk of fatal hepatosplenic T-cell lymphoma in adolescents and young adults receiving this therapy. These risks should be discussed with any patient before the initiation of treatment and again during treatment. Alternative therapies should be discussed as needed, especially when the duration of azathioprine use extends beyond a year.

Other immunosuppressants

Cyclosporine (discussed below) offered some benefit in an adult CIDP trial [45, Class III] and in a small series of children [46, Class IV].

Case reports and retrospective trials have looked at other immunosuppressant medications, but data pertaining to their efficacy in children is sparse.

Physical therapy and exercise

Physical therapy is an important component of the long-term management of CIDP. This intervention may help children, especially in the recovery phase of exacerbations, and also may help to prevent contractures.

Juvenile myasthenia gravis

  • Patients with juvenile myasthenia gravis (JMG) can be offered three main categories of disease-modifying therapy: acetylcholinesterase inhibitors (AChE-I), medical immunomodulation or immunosuppression, and surgical intervention (thymectomy).

Diagnosis

  • JMG is an autoimmune disorder resulting from antibodies directed at neuromuscular junction proteins, most commonly acetylcholine receptors (AChR). Children develop symptoms of muscle fatigability due to impaired neuromuscular transmission. Prepubertal patients often present with isolated oculomotor symptoms, including diplopia and ptosis [47, Class IV]. Some children go on to develop generalized weakness, though this appears to occur less frequently than in post-pubertal patients. No clear gender predominance exists in prepubertal JMG patients [48, Class IV], but a female preponderance emerges after puberty [49, 50, Class IV]. JMG can present at any age but is less common during infancy. In infants and toddlers, JMG may be difficult to differentiate from transient neonatal myasthenia gravis and congenital myasthenic syndrome.

  • Although the diagnosis of JMG is based primarily upon the clinical presentation, supportive data include the presence of serum antibodies, edrophonium testing, and abnormal electrodiagnostic testing (repetitive nerve stimulation and single-fiber electromyography [EMG]).

  • Whereas antibodies to the nicotinic AChR are found in 80% of adults with myasthenia gravis [51], only 50% of prepubertal and 70% of peripubertal JMG patients have anti-AChR antibodies [49, 52, Class IV]. Antibodies to muscle-specific kinase (MuSK) and to striated muscle have been reported in children but are rare in JMG, and the cost of anti-MuSK titers is often higher than that of AChR antibody titers [53•, 54].

  • Edrophonium testing involves the use of a short-acting AChE-I. Dosing in infants should be discussed with a neurologist experienced with performing the test in this age group. Children older than 1 year who weigh less than 34 kg are treated with an edrophonium test dose of 0.5 mg, followed by 1-mg increments to a maximum total dose of 5 mg. Children weighing 34 kg or more are treated with the adult edrophonium dose, a 0.5-mg test dose followed by increments of 1 to 2 mg until a maximum dose of 10 mg is attained. In addition to clinical monitoring, preinjection and postinjection photos, taken with the consent of the patient and/or family, may be helpful. Because of the risk of symptomatic bradycardia, asystole, and hypotension, testing must be performed in a monitored setting with staff trained in cardiac resuscitation. Some patients with congenital myasthenic syndrome may deteriorate with exposure to an AChE-I (e.g., COLQ mutation or AChR slow channel mutation). Positive edrophonium testing is not specific for JMG and can be seen with other disorders of neuromuscular transmission. Lambert-Eaton myasthenic syndrome (LEMS) has been reported in children but is exceedingly rare in this age group [55].

  • Young children may require sedation to facilitate repetitive stimulation and stimulated single-fiber EMG.

Diet and lifestyle

Adequate intake of vitamin D and calcium is essential for optimizing bone health and reducing risk of osteoporosis. Recommendations for vitamin D supplementation vary, but a dose of 800 to 1000 IU daily is reasonable. Calcium intake should be optimized primarily from dietary sources.

Growth velocity and weight gain should be closely monitored, particularly in children receiving corticosteroids.

Pharmacologic therapy

Pyridostigmine

Pyridostigmine bromide is standard first-line JMG therapy.

Standard dosage

Initial oral dosing is 0.5 to 1 mg/kg per dose (maximum 60 mg) every 4 to 6 h while awake. Onset of effect occurs rapidly (within 15–30 min) and duration is up to 3 to 4 h. For young children, regular tablets may be crushed or the liquid form (60 mg/5 mL) can be used. The maximum daily dose is 7 mg/kg per day or 300 mg/day. In rare cases, higher doses may be used, but only if prescribed by a neurologist experienced with this medication. The intravenous form of pyridostigmine requires a significant dose adjustment, so it should be used with caution, if at all.

Drug interactions

Pyridostigmine may increase the effects of depolarizing neuromuscular blocking drugs (e.g., succinylcholine, aminoglycosides) and β-blockers. Corticosteroids may lessen the effects of pyridostigmine. Atropine is an antagonist.

Main side effects

Muscarinic (cholinergic) effects (e.g., cramping, diarrhea, salivation) may limit dosing in some children. Overdosage may precipitate a cholinergic crisis, which can be difficult to distinguish from a myasthenic crisis except for superimposed muscarinic symptoms, which may not be obvious in every patient.

Intravenous immunoglobulin

IVIG is commonly used to treat acute JMG exacerbations and also is used as chronic maintenance therapy for some patients. Data pertaining to IVIG efficacy in myasthenia gravis (MG) is based largely on data from adult randomized placebo-control trials [56, Class I].

Standard dosage

Acute JMG exacerbations are treated with 2 g/kg of IVIG, divided over 2 to 5 days [53•]. The precise dose of IVIG remains unclear, with an adult study documenting no short-term difference in efficacy between 1 g/kg versus 2 g/kg [57, Class I]. Anecdotally, some patients can be maintained on chronic IVIG therapy (typically 1 g/kg every few weeks, with the exact interval depending on severity), but there are no randomized studies supporting this approach [58].

Mechanism of action

Multiple actions have been postulated. IVIG has been shown to neutralize the blocking effects of some autoantibodies [15]. IVIG is also thought to downregulate T-cell activity and antibody production.

Side effects

Headache, nausea, vomiting, allergic reactions, and aseptic meningitis may occur. IVIG must be used cautiously in children with cardiac or renal dysfunction. Renal failure has been described in rare cases.

Cost

IVIG is very expensive.

Corticosteroids

Corticosteroids (prednisone, prednisolone, methylprednisolone) are effective immunosuppressants with good evidence for their efficacy in MG [59, Class II]. Steroid therapy is a traditional choice for MG patients requiring long-term immunosuppression [60•, Class IV]. Several studies have demonstrated a beneficial response in more than 70% of adult MG patients [6164; Class IV].

Standard dosage

Caution must be taken when initiating therapy, as increased weakness may occur within the first 1 to 2 weeks of treatment, potentially precipitating a myasthenic crisis [61]. To minimize this risk, outpatient corticosteroid therapy should be started at a low dose (typically 0.5 mg/kg per day; maximum 30 mg/day) and gradually increased at weekly increments until an effect is observed [53•]. Severely ill patients who are admitted to the hospital may start at higher doses (intravenous methylprednisolone 2 mg/kg per day, with a maximum of 60–80 mg/day), but they need to be observed in the hospital for at least a week after initiation [53•].

Mechanism of action

Corticosteroids exert a broad immunosuppressive effect; the function and numbers of lymphocytes and monocytes are particularly affected [41].

Main side effects

The numerous side effects of chronic corticosteroid therapy [42] are particularly detrimental to children who are at a critical stage of vertical growth and bone mineral deposition. In rare cases, the initiation of steroids has been linked to hip osteonecrosis. Potential complications from long-term corticosteroid therapy can include decreased linear growth velocity and reduction of final adult height, bone demineralization, weight gain, acne, and behavior problems. Hypertension, hyperglycemia, and cataracts may occur.

Special points

Depending on the severity of the case and the expected duration of treatment, a steroid-sparing drug (e.g., azathioprine) may be started simultaneously, with the goal of reducing the duration of steroid treatment.

Cost

Steroids are inexpensive, but they may cause significant and costly long-term side effects when used on a chronic basis.

Azathioprine

Azathioprine is commonly used as a steroid-sparing immunosuppressant agent in adult MG [65, Class IV] and JMG [48, 50, 53•, Class IV]. Although randomized trials in adult MG patients have not found azathioprine to improve clinical strength scores [66, Class I], it has been shown to be associated with lower corticosteroid dosing during long-term use by patients with chronic MG [67, Class I].

Dosage and side effects are similar to those in patients with CIDP, as discussed above.

Cyclosporine

Cyclosporine, also classified as a steroid-sparing immunosuppressant, has proven beneficial in adult MG [68, Class I; 69, 70, Class III], and its use has been reported in some JMG patients [50, Class IV].

Standard dosage

Dosing of cyclosporine for JMG has not been established, but the dosing guidelines for inflammatory diseases may be a useful guide. These suggest a starting dose of 2.5 mg/kg per day divided in two doses. At 8 and 12 weeks of therapy, the dose may be increased by 0.5 to 0.75 mg/kg per day. The maximum dose is 4 mg/kg per day. The dosage may need to be adjusted for renal or hepatic impairment. Different brands of cyclosporine are not bioequivalent, so each patient must stay on the same brand for the duration of therapy. Checking serum levels and monitoring for signs of end-organ toxicity are essential. Neurologists not experienced in the use of cyclosporine in children should consult with a colleague who has such experience before initiating therapy.

Mechanism of action

Cyclosporine inhibits the production and release of interleukin 2, thereby inhibiting T-cell activation.

Main side effects

Adverse effects may include abdominal pain, nausea, diarrhea, hepatitis, bone marrow suppression, hirsutism, and gingival hyperplasia. Serious potential effects include nephrotoxicity (often manifesting as hypertension), malignancy, and infections. Seizures infrequently occur (particularly if receiving concomitant high-dose corticosteroids). These side effects must be discussed with patients and their families before initiation of treatment. Breast-feeding is contraindicated during therapy.

Drug interactions

Cyclosporine is metabolized via the cytochrome P450 pathway, giving rise to many potential drug interactions.

Tacrolimus

Tacrolimus therapy appeared promising in one small, unblinded, randomized trial [71, Class II] and one nonrandomized trial in adult MG patients [72, Class III]. Tacrolimus has been used for other pediatric diseases such as severe atopic dermatitis and in children who have received solid-organ transplants. There are no data pertaining to the use of this drug in JMG, so a physician experienced in its use should be consulted prior to the initiation of therapy. Blood testing is required to determine therapeutic levels and monitor for signs of end-organ toxicity.

Mechanism of action

Tacrolimus affects intracellular calcineurin, inhibiting T-cell activation.

Main side effects

Adverse effects can include nausea, diarrhea, bone marrow suppression, hypertension (nephrotoxicity), neurotoxicity (encephalopathy, polyneuropathy), ototoxicity, and increased risk of malignancy.

Drug interactions

Concomitant use with other immunosuppressants can increase risk of infection and secondary malignancy. Concomitant use with cyclosporine may increase the risk of nephrotoxicity. Tacrolimus is metabolized via the cytochrome P450 pathway, giving rise to many potential drug interactions. Grapefruit may increase the serum tacrolimus concentration.

Other immunosuppressants

Methotrexate is often used as an alternative immunosuppressant agent in adults with MG who are unable to tolerate azathioprine, although very little published evidence supports the use of this drug in MG. The proven efficacy of methotrexate for other autoimmune diseases (such as dermatomyositis, discussed below) is used as the main argument for the use of this drug in MG.

Cyclophosphamide therapy has been used for severe, treatment-resistant adult MG [65, Class IV].

Rituximab has been used with promising results in adults with severe, refractory MG [73, Class IV], although the efficacy of this drug in JMG is unclear.

There are a number of anecdotal reports of the efficacy of mycophenolate mofetil in adult MG, but a large randomized controlled trial in adults failed to show a clear benefit [74, Class I]. Thus its role in MG therapy is unclear at this time.

Plasma exchange

  • PE is an alternative to IVIG for treating acute exacerbations [18, Class I] (typically with five exchanges performed on alternate days) or chronic JMG (typically one exchange every few weeks) [53•], although no randomized trials support the long-term use of PE in this population. IVIG and PE show equal short-term efficacy in treating exacerbations of adult MG [18, Class I; 75•, Class I]. PE also has been shown to be beneficial when administered to adults with MG prior to thymectomy, reducing the duration of postoperative mechanical ventilation [76•, Class II].

  • Potential short-term side effects of PE include hypotension, electrolyte imbalance, or coagulopathy. Chronic PE frequently causes anemia, and it also may cause hypocalcemia and hypogammaglobulinemia, with increased susceptibility to infection [18].

Surgical therapy

  • Thymectomy is often performed in patients with generalized MG, including children. The presence of a thymoma is an absolute indication for thymectomy. Based on retrospective data, thymectomy also appears to be beneficial for nonthymomatous generalized JMG, with almost 70% of patients improving after thymectomy and 40% exhibiting complete remission, including discontinuation of medication [77••, Class III]. These outcomes are better than the overall spontaneous remission rate of 14% to 30% in JMG [78, 79, Class IV]. Two retrospective studies also report an association between early thymectomy and likelihood of remission in JMG [77••, 78, Class IV]. These studies support the role of thymectomy as a therapy for JMG. Prospective data would be helpful, but conducting such a study would be difficult.

Physical therapy and exercise

  • MG is one of the only neuromuscular disorders in which physical therapy and exercise should be used with caution. Excessive physical activity will often trigger worsening of symptoms. Physical therapy should be initiated only upon the recommendation of the treating neurologist, and is usually most helpful in the later stages of recovery or in the postoperative period after thymectomy. Light to moderate exercise is often beneficial, but only as tolerated by the patient.

Dermatomyositis

  • Juvenile dermatomyositis (JDM) accounts for at least 85% of inflammatory myopathies in childhood [80]. JDM is a systemic disease resulting from desensitization of lymphocytes with subsequent damage mediated by autoantibodies and complement.

  • Immunosuppressant therapy is the mainstay of JDM treatment and has brought about a marked improvement in long-term outcome with the advent of early and consistent treatment [81]. Mortality from JDM has decreased from 25% [81] to less than 2% [82]. Morbidity has also lessened, with one follow-up study reporting moderate to severe disability in less than 10% of children [82]. Treatment strategies in JDM are based on small, retrospective studies and expert opinion. There are no randomized controlled trials pertaining to JDM treatment.

Diagnosis

  • Classically, the diagnostic criteria for dermatomyositis require patients to have a characteristic skin rash as well as any three of the following four additional features: symmetrical proximal muscle weakness, raised muscle enzyme levels, perifascicular atrophy on muscle biopsy, or myopathic findings on EMG [83]. Most children will present with involvement of skin (90%) and/or muscle (>80%) [80, 84]. EMG is now performed for the diagnostic evaluation of dermatomyositis than less often than in the past, but it may be useful in cases of atypical presentations. Muscle MRI is a relatively new diagnostic tool that is becoming increasingly popular.

  • Common muscle symptoms include myalgia and symmetrical weakness of the neck and hip flexors. When weakness precedes the characteristic skin findings, it may be difficult to distinguish JDM from other inflammatory myopathies (i.e., polymyositis, overlap myositis) or even some forms of muscular dystrophy.

  • The characteristic skin findings of JDM include the heliotrope rash and Gottron papules (seen in 75% of patients) [84]. Other skin findings include malar rash, periungual telangiectasia, mouth ulcers, skin ulceration, and calcinosis.

  • Organ systems less commonly involved include lungs (interstitial lung disease), gut (gastrointestinal bleeding), joints (arthralgia), heart (myocarditis), and eyes (cataracts).

  • JDM is associated with autoantibodies in about 40% to 50% of cases [85, 86•]. Myositis-specific autoantibodies such as anti-Jo-1, anti-p155, and anti-p140 are the most common autoantibodies seen in JDM [86•]. An elevation of antinuclear antibodies (ANA), serum creatine kinase (CK), or erythrocyte sedimentation rate (ESR) is also found in many, though not all, children with active JDM [87].

  • Adult dermatomyositis is typically associated with malignancy, but this is rare in JDM, and screening for occult malignancy is not necessary unless clinical suspicion exists [85, Class IV].

Diet and lifestyle

Adequate intake of vitamin D and calcium is essential for optimizing bone health and reducing risk of osteoporosis. Recommendations for vitamin D supplementation vary, but a dose of 800 to 1000 IU daily is reasonable. Calcium intake should be optimized primarily from dietary sources.

Growth velocity and weight gain should be closely monitored, particularly in children receiving corticosteroids.

Pharmacologic therapy

Corticosteroids

Corticosteroids are used by most clinicians in the treatment of JDM. A recent North American practice survey of pediatric rheumatologists revealed that clinicians treat mild JDM with corticosteroid monotherapy (<10% of cases); combination corticosteroid and methotrexate (40%), or corticosteroid, methotrexate, and hydrochloroquine (35%). Severe JDM was often treated with combined corticosteroid, methotrexate, and IVIG therapy or corticosteroids and cyclophosphamide [88•, Class IV].

Standard dosage

Therapy may begin with either high-dose oral prednisone (2 mg/kg per day, maximum 60–80 mg/day) or pulse intravenous methylprednisolone (20–30 mg/kg per day, maximum 1 g/day for 5 days) In either case, daily oral prednisone is then continued at 2 mg/kg per day (maximum 60–80 mg/day) for 4 weeks before gradual tapering [89••, Class IV]. Early and aggressive corticosteroid therapy is associated with better disease outcome [90, Class IV].

Main side effects

The numerous side effects of chronic corticosteroid therapy [42] are particularly detrimental to children who are at a critical stage of vertical growth and bone mineral deposition. In rare cases the initiation of steroids has been linked to hip osteonecrosis. Potential complications from long-term corticosteroid therapy can include decreased linear growth velocity and reduction of final adult height, bone demineralization, weight gain, acne, and behavior problems. Hypertension, hyperglycemia, and cataracts may occur.

Methotrexate

Combination therapy using methotrexate and a corticosteroid has been shown to improve long-term outcome and reduce corticosteroid-related side effects in JDM. [91, 92, Class II].

Mechanism of action

Methotrexate is a dihydrofolate reductase inhibitor, which causes depletion of folic acid and depletion of DNA precursors.

Main side effects

Adverse effects can include nausea, diarrhea, bone marrow suppression, alopecia, rash, cystitis, hepatitis, and nephropathy. Female patients should be counseled about the risk of teratogenicity.

Drug interactions

Penicillin and aspirin may increase methotrexate levels.

Hydroxychloroquine

Hydroxychloroquine has also been used as a successful adjunct therapy for JDM [93, Class III] and is often started concomitantly with corticosteroids and methotrexate, particularly in mild JDM [88•].

Mechanism of action

Hydroxychloroquine interferes with leukocyte chemotaxis and complement-dependent antigen–antibody reactions.

Main side effects

Adverse effects can include nausea, diarrhea, bone marrow suppression, psychiatric symptoms, rash, photosensitivity, and hepatotoxicity.

Other immunosuppressants

Severe or refractory JDM has been treated with IVIG [94, Class IV], cyclosporine [95, Class IV; 96, Class III], cyclophosphamide [97, Class IV], mycophenolate mofetil [98, Class IV], tacrolimus [99, Class IV], and rituximab [100, Class IV]. One small retrospective study has suggested that certain JDM patients may do well with IVIG and/or methotrexate therapy alone (i.e., no corticosteroids) [101•, Class IV], but this study must be interpreted with caution, particularly as corticosteroid therapy is accepted as the standard of care by most physicians [88•].

Physical therapy and exercise

  • Physical therapy and exercise will often be helpful in JDM, but the level of potential activity may be limited when the weakness is severe.

Acknowledgments

Disclosure

H. McMillan: none; B. Darras: consulting fees from Isis Pharmaceuticals, Athena Diagnostics; P. Kang: none.

Open Access

This article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution Noncommercial License which permits any noncommercial use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author(s) and source are credited.

References and Recommended Reading

Papers of particular interest, published recently, have been highlighted as: • Of importance ••Of major importance

  • 1.Dalakas MC. Basic aspects of neuroimmunology as they relate to immunotherapeutic targets: present and future prospects. Ann Neurol. 1995;37(Suppl 1):S2–13. doi: 10.1002/ana.410370703. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 2.Oomes PG, Jacobs BC, Hazenberg MP, Banffer JR, van der Meche FG. Anti-GM1 IgG antibodies and Campylobacter bacteria in Guillain-Barre syndrome: evidence of molecular mimicry. Ann Neurol. 1995;38(2):170–175. doi: 10.1002/ana.410380208. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 3.al-Qudah AA, Shahar E, Logan WJ, Murphy EG. Neonatal Guillain-Barre syndrome. Pediatr Neurol. 1988;4(4):255–256. doi: 10.1016/0887-8994(88)90042-2. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 4.Vajsar J, Fehlings D, Stephens D. Long-term outcome in children with Guillain-Barre syndrome. J Pediatr. 2003;142(3):305–309. doi: 10.1067/mpd.2003.115. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 5.Bradshaw DY, Jones HR., Jr Guillain-Barre syndrome in children: clinical course, electrodiagnosis, and prognosis. Muscle Nerve. 1992;15(4):500–506. doi: 10.1002/mus.880150415. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 6.Nguyen DK, Agenarioti-Belanger S, Vanasse M. Pain and the Guillain-Barre syndrome in children under 6 years old. J Pediatr. 1999;134(6):773–776. doi: 10.1016/S0022-3476(99)70297-0. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 7.••.Roodbol J, de Wit MC, Walgaard C, de Hoog M, Catsman-Berrevoets CE, Jacobs BC. Recognizing Guillain-Barre syndrome in preschool children. Neurology. 2011;76(9):807–810. doi: 10.1212/WNL.0b013e31820e7b62. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 8.Asbury AK, Cornblath DR. Assessment of current diagnostic criteria for Guillain-Barre syndrome. Ann Neurol. 1990;27(Suppl):S21–24. doi: 10.1002/ana.410270707. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 9.•.Yikilmaz A, Doganay S, Gumus H, Per H, Kumandas S, Coskun A. Magnetic resonance imaging of childhood Guillain-Barre syndrome. Childs Nerv Syst. 2010;26(8):1103–1108. doi: 10.1007/s00381-010-1197-8. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 10.Nagasawa K, Kuwabara S, Misawa S, Fujii K, Tanabe Y, Yuki N, Hattori T, Kohno Y. Electrophysiological subtypes and prognosis of childhood Guillain-Barre syndrome in Japan. Muscle Nerve. 2006;33(6):766–770. doi: 10.1002/mus.20520. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 11.Hughes RA, Wijdicks EF, Barohn R, Benson E, Cornblath DR, Hahn AF, Meythaler JM, Miller RG, Sladky JT, Stevens JC. Practice parameter: immunotherapy for Guillain-Barre syndrome: report of the Quality Standards Subcommittee of the American Academy of Neurology. Neurology. 2003;61(6):736–740. doi: 10.1212/wnl.61.6.736. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 12.Gurses N, Uysal S, Cetinkaya F, Islek I, Kalayci AG. Intravenous immunoglobulin treatment in children with Guillain-Barre syndrome. Scand J Infect Dis. 1995;27(3):241–243. doi: 10.3109/00365549509019016. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 13.Korinthenberg R, Schessl J, Kirschner J, Monting JS. Intravenously administered immunoglobulin in the treatment of childhood Guillain-Barre syndrome: a randomized trial. Pediatrics. 2005;116(1):8–14. doi: 10.1542/peds.2004-1324. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 14.Korinthenberg R, Monting JS. Natural history and treatment effects in Guillain-Barre syndrome: a multicentre study. Arch Dis Child. 1996;74(4):281–287. doi: 10.1136/adc.74.4.281. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 15.Buchwald B, Ahangari R, Weishaupt A, Toyka KV. Intravenous immunoglobulins neutralize blocking antibodies in Guillain-Barre syndrome. Ann Neurol. 2002;51(6):673–680. doi: 10.1002/ana.10205. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 16.Raphael JC, Chevret S, Hughes RA, Annane D. Plasma exchange for Guillain-Barre syndrome. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2002(2):CD001798. [DOI] [PubMed]
  • 17.Epstein MA, Sladky JT. The role of plasmapheresis in childhood Guillain-Barre syndrome. Ann Neurol. 1990;28(1):65–69. doi: 10.1002/ana.410280112. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 18.Gajdos P, Chevret S, Clair B, Tranchant C, Chastang C. Clinical trial of plasma exchange and high-dose intravenous immunoglobulin in myasthenia gravis. Myasthenia Gravis Clinical Study Group. Ann Neurol. 1997;41(6):789–796. doi: 10.1002/ana.410410615. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 19.Hughes RA, Newsom-Davis JM, Perkin GD, Pierce JM. Controlled trial prednisolone in acute polyneuropathy. Lancet. 1978;2(8093):750–753. doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(78)92644-2. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 20.Research criteria for diagnosis of chronic inflammatory demyelinating polyneuropathy (CIDP) Report from an Ad Hoc Subcommittee of the American Academy of Neurology AIDS Task Force. Neurology. 1991;41(5):617–618. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 21.McCombe PA, Pollard JD, McLeod JG. Chronic inflammatory demyelinating polyradiculoneuropathy. A clinical and electrophysiological study of 92 cases. Brain. 1987;110(Pt 6):1617–1630. doi: 10.1093/brain/110.6.1617. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 22.Nevo Y, Topaloglu H. 88th ENMC international workshop: childhood chronic inflammatory demyelinating polyneuropathy (including revised diagnostic criteria), Naarden, The Netherlands, December 8–10, 2000. Neuromuscul Disord. 2002;12(2):195–200. doi: 10.1016/S0960-8966(01)00286-3. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 23.Duggins AJ, McLeod JG, Pollard JD, Davies L, Yang F, Thompson EO, Soper JR. Spinal root and plexus hypertrophy in chronic inflammatory demyelinating polyneuropathy. Brain. 1999;122(Pt 7):1383–1390. doi: 10.1093/brain/122.7.1383. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 24.Ryan MM, Grattan-Smith PJ, Procopis PG, Morgan G, Ouvrier RA. Childhood chronic inflammatory demyelinating polyneuropathy: clinical course and long-term outcome. Neuromuscul Disord. 2000;10(6):398–406. doi: 10.1016/S0960-8966(00)00119-X. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 25.Cellerini M, Salti S, Desideri V, Marconi G. MR imaging of the cauda equina in hereditary motor sensory neuropathies: correlations with sural nerve biopsy. AJNR Am J Neuroradiol. 2000;21(10):1793–1798. [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 26.••.Eftimov F, Winer JB, Vermeulen M, de Haan R, van Schaik IN. Intravenous immunoglobulin for chronic inflammatory demyelinating polyradiculoneuropathy. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2009(1):CD001797. This Cochrane Database review found that IVIG was better than placebo for the treatment of CIDP. IVIG, plasma exchange, and steroids were found to be equally efficacious for this disease. The studies analyzed were performed primarily on adult patients.
  • 27.Korinthenberg R. Chronic inflammatory demyelinating polyradiculoneuropathy in children and their response to treatment. Neuropediatrics. 1999;30(4):190–196. doi: 10.1055/s-2007-973489. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 28.Rossignol E, D'Anjou G, Lapointe N, Haddad E, Vanasse M. Evolution and treatment of childhood chronic inflammatory polyneuropathy. Pediatr Neurol. 2007;36(2):88–94. doi: 10.1016/j.pediatrneurol.2006.09.012. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 29.Simmons Z, Wald JJ, Albers JW. Chronic inflammatory demyelinating polyradiculoneuropathy in children: II. Long-term follow-up, with comparison to adults. Muscle Nerve. 1997;20(12):1569–1575. doi: 10.1002/(SICI)1097-4598(199712)20:12&#x0003c;1569::AID-MUS12&#x0003e;3.0.CO;2-W. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 30.Vedanarayanan VV, Kandt RS, Lewis DV, Jr, DeLong GR. Chronic inflammatory demyelinating polyradiculoneuropathy of childhood: treatment with high-dose intravenous immunoglobulin. Neurology. 1991;41(6):828–830. doi: 10.1212/wnl.41.6.828. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 31.Nevo Y, Pestronk A, Kornberg AJ, Connolly AM, Yee WC, Iqbal I, Shield LK. Childhood chronic inflammatory demyelinating neuropathies: clinical course and long-term follow-up. Neurology. 1996;47(1):98–102. doi: 10.1212/wnl.47.1.98. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 32.Hattori N, Ichimura M, Aoki S, Nagamatsu M, Yasuda T, Kumazawa K, Yamamoto K, Mitsuma T, Sobue G. Clinicopathological features of chronic inflammatory demyelinating polyradiculoneuropathy in childhood. J Neurol Sci. 1998;154(1):66–71. doi: 10.1016/S0022-510X(97)00216-5. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 33.Hahn AF, Bolton CF, Zochodne D, Feasby TE. Intravenous immunoglobulin treatment in chronic inflammatory demyelinating polyneuropathy. A double-blind, placebo-controlled, cross-over study. Brain. 1996;119(Pt 4):1067–1077. doi: 10.1093/brain/119.4.1067. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 34.Hughes RA, Donofrio P, Bril V, Dalakas MC, Deng C, Hanna K, Hartung HP, Latov N, Merkies IS, van Doorn PA. Intravenous immune globulin (10% caprylate-chromatography purified) for the treatment of chronic inflammatory demyelinating polyradiculoneuropathy (ICE study): a randomised placebo-controlled trial. Lancet Neurol. 2008;7(2):136–144. doi: 10.1016/S1474-4422(07)70329-0. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 35.Thompson N, Choudhary P, Hughes RA, Quinlivan RM. A novel trial design to study the effect of intravenous immunoglobulin in chronic inflammatory demyelinating polyradiculoneuropathy. J Neurol. 1996;243(3):280–285. doi: 10.1007/BF00868527. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 36.Mendell JR, Barohn RJ, Freimer ML, Kissel JT, King W, Nagaraja HN, Rice R, Campbell WW, Donofrio PD, Jackson CE, Lewis RA, Shy M, Simpson DM, Parry GJ, Rivner MH, Thornton CA, Bromberg MB, Tandan R, Harati Y, Giuliani MJ. Randomized controlled trial of IVIg in untreated chronic inflammatory demyelinating polyradiculoneuropathy. Neurology. 2001;56(4):445–449. doi: 10.1212/wnl.56.4.445. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 37.Vermeulen M, van Doorn PA, Brand A, Strengers PF, Jennekens FG, Busch HF. Intravenous immunoglobulin treatment in patients with chronic inflammatory demyelinating polyneuropathy: a double blind, placebo controlled study. J Neurol Neurosurg Psychiatry. 1993;56(1):36–39. doi: 10.1136/jnnp.56.1.36. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 38.Hahn AF, Bolton CF, Pillay N, Chalk C, Benstead T, Bril V, Shumak K, Vandervoort MK, Feasby TE. Plasma-exchange therapy in chronic inflammatory demyelinating polyneuropathy. A double-blind, sham-controlled, cross-over study. Brain. 1996;119(Pt 4):1055–1066. doi: 10.1093/brain/119.4.1055. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 39.Dyck PJ, Litchy WJ, Kratz KM, Suarez GA, Low PA, Pineda AA, Windebank AJ, Karnes JL, O'Brien PC. A plasma exchange versus immune globulin infusion trial in chronic inflammatory demyelinating polyradiculoneuropathy. Ann Neurol. 1994;36(6):838–845. doi: 10.1002/ana.410360607. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 40.Hughes R, Bensa S, Willison H, Van den Bergh P, Comi G, Illa I, Nobile-Orazio E, van Doorn P, Dalakas M, Bojar M, Swan A. Randomized controlled trial of intravenous immunoglobulin versus oral prednisolone in chronic inflammatory demyelinating polyradiculoneuropathy. Ann Neurol. 2001;50(2):195–201. doi: 10.1002/ana.1088. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 41.Fauci AS, Dale DC, Balow JE. Glucocorticosteroid therapy: mechanisms of action and clinical considerations. Ann Intern Med. 1976;84(3):304–315. doi: 10.7326/0003-4819-84-3-304. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 42.Bromberg MB, Carter O. Corticosteroid use in the treatment of neuromuscular disorders: empirical and evidence-based data. Muscle Nerve. 2004;30(1):20–37. doi: 10.1002/mus.20075. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 43.Dyck PJ, O'Brien P, Swanson C, Low P, Daube J. Combined azathioprine and prednisone in chronic inflammatory-demyelinating polyneuropathy. Neurology. 1985;35(8):1173–1176. doi: 10.1212/wnl.35.8.1173. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 44.Lindner A, Schalke B, Toyka KV. Outcome in juvenile-onset myasthenia gravis: a retrospective study with long-term follow-up of 79 patients. J Neurol. 1997;244(8):515–520. doi: 10.1007/s004150050135. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 45.Barnett MH, Pollard JD, Davies L, McLeod JG. Cyclosporin A in resistant chronic inflammatory demyelinating polyradiculoneuropathy. Muscle Nerve. 1998;21(4):454–460. doi: 10.1002/(SICI)1097-4598(199804)21:4&#x0003c;454::AID-MUS3&#x0003e;3.0.CO;2-8. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 46.Herguner MO, Incecik F, Altunbasak S. Cyclosporin treatment in three children with chronic inflammatory demyelinating neuropathy. Pediatr Neurol. 2009;41(3):223–225. doi: 10.1016/j.pediatrneurol.2009.03.016. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 47.Mullaney P, Vajsar J, Smith R, Buncic JR. The natural history and ophthalmic involvement in childhood myasthenia gravis at the hospital for sick children. Ophthalmology. 2000;107(3):504–510. doi: 10.1016/S0161-6420(99)00138-4. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 48.Ashraf VV, Taly AB, Veerendrakumar M, Rao S. Myasthenia gravis in children: a longitudinal study. Acta Neurol Scand. 2006;114(2):119–123. doi: 10.1111/j.1600-0404.2006.00646.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 49.Andrews PI, Massey JM, Howard JF, Jr, Sanders DB. Race, sex, and puberty influence onset, severity, and outcome in juvenile myasthenia gravis. Neurology. 1994;44(7):1208–1214. doi: 10.1212/wnl.44.7.1208. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 50.Evoli A, Batocchi AP, Bartoccioni E, Lino MM, Minisci C, Tonali P. Juvenile myasthenia gravis with prepubertal onset. Neuromuscul Disord. 1998;8(8):561–567. doi: 10.1016/S0960-8966(98)00077-7. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 51.Drachman DB. Myasthenia gravis. N Engl J Med. 1994;330(25):1797–1810. doi: 10.1056/NEJM199406233302507. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 52.Andrews PI, Massey JM, Sanders DB. Acetylcholine receptor antibodies in juvenile myasthenia gravis. Neurology. 1993;43(5):977–982. doi: 10.1212/wnl.43.5.977. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 53.•.Chiang LM, Darras BT, Kang PB. Juvenile myasthenia gravis. Muscle Nerve. 2009;39(4):423–431. doi: 10.1002/mus.21195. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 54.Anlar B, Yilmaz V, Saruhan-Direskeneli G. Long remission in muscle-specific kinase antibody-positive juvenile myasthenia. Pediatr Neurol. 2009;40(6):455–456. doi: 10.1016/j.pediatrneurol.2008.11.014. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 55.Tsao CY, Mendell JR, Friemer ML, Kissel JT. Lambert-Eaton myasthenic syndrome in children. J Child Neurol. 2002;17(1):74–76. doi: 10.1177/088307380201700123. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 56.Zinman L, Ng E, Bril V. IV immunoglobulin in patients with myasthenia gravis: a randomized controlled trial. Neurology. 2007;68(11):837–841. doi: 10.1212/01.wnl.0000256698.69121.45. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 57.Gajdos P, Tranchant C, Clair B, Bolgert F, Eymard B, Stojkovic T, Attarian S, Chevret S. Treatment of myasthenia gravis exacerbation with intravenous immunoglobulin: a randomized double-blind clinical trial. Arch Neurol. 2005;62(11):1689–1693. doi: 10.1001/archneur.62.11.1689. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 58.Gajdos P, Chevret S, Toyka K. Intravenous immunoglobulin for myasthenia gravis. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2008(1):CD002277. [DOI] [PubMed]
  • 59.Lindberg C, Andersen O, Lefvert AK. Treatment of myasthenia gravis with methylprednisolone pulse: a double blind study. Acta Neurol Scand. 1998;97(6):370–373. doi: 10.1111/j.1600-0404.1998.tb05968.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 60.•.Skeie GO, Apostolski S, Evoli A, Gilhus NE, Illa I, Harms L, Hilton-Jones D, Melms A, Verschuuren J, Horge HW. Guidelines for treatment of autoimmune neuromuscular transmission disorders. Eur J Neurol. 2010;17(7):893–902. doi: 10.1111/j.1468-1331.2010.03019.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 61.Pascuzzi RM, Coslett HB, Johns TR. Long-term corticosteroid treatment of myasthenia gravis: report of 116 patients. Ann Neurol. 1984;15(3):291–298. doi: 10.1002/ana.410150316. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 62.Sghirlanzoni A, Peluchetti D, Mantegazza R, Fiacchino F, Cornelio F. Myasthenia gravis: prolonged treatment with steroids. Neurology. 1984;34(2):170–174. doi: 10.1212/wnl.34.2.170. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 63.Cosi V, Citterio A, Lombardi M, Piccolo G, Romani A, Erbetta A. Effectiveness of steroid treatment in myasthenia gravis: a retrospective study. Acta Neurol Scand. 1991;84(1):33–39. doi: 10.1111/j.1600-0404.1991.tb04899.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 64.Evoli A, Batocchi AP, Palmisani MT, Lo Monaco M, Tonali P. Long-term results of corticosteroid therapy in patients with myasthenia gravis. Eur Neurol. 1992;32(1):37–43. doi: 10.1159/000116785. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 65.Sathasivam S. Steroids and immunosuppressant drugs in myasthenia gravis. Nat Clin Pract Neurol. 2008;4(6):317–327. doi: 10.1038/ncpneuro0810. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 66.A randomised clinical trial comparing prednisone and azathioprine in myasthenia gravis. Results of the second interim analysis. Myasthenia Gravis Clinical Study Group. J Neurol Neurosurg Psychiatry. 1993;56(11):1157–63. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed]
  • 67.Palace J, Newsom-Davis J, Lecky B. A randomized double-blind trial of prednisolone alone or with azathioprine in myasthenia gravis. Myasthenia Gravis Study Group. Neurology. 1998;50(6):1778–1783. doi: 10.1212/wnl.50.6.1778. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 68.Tindall RS, Phillips JT, Rollins JA, Wells L, Hall K. A clinical therapeutic trial of cyclosporine in myasthenia gravis. Ann N Y Acad Sci. 1993;681:539–551. doi: 10.1111/j.1749-6632.1993.tb22937.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 69.Bonifati DM, Angelini C. Long-term cyclosporine treatment in a group of severe myasthenia gravis patients. J Neurol. 1997;244(9):542–547. doi: 10.1007/s004150050141. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 70.Lavrnic D, Vujic A, Rakocevic-Stojanovic V, Stevic Z, Basta I, Pavlovic S, Trikic R, Apostolski S. Cyclosporine in the treatment of myasthenia gravis. Acta Neurol Scand. 2005;111(4):247–252. doi: 10.1111/j.1600-0404.2005.00378.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 71.Nagane Y, Utsugisawa K, Obara D, Kondoh R, Terayama Y. Efficacy of low-dose FK506 in the treatment of Myasthenia gravis--a randomized pilot study. Eur Neurol. 2005;53(3):146–150. doi: 10.1159/000085833. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 72.Ponseti JM, Gamez J, Azem J, Lopez-Cano M, Vilallonga R, Armengol M. Tacrolimus for myasthenia gravis: a clinical study of 212 patients. Ann N Y Acad Sci. 2008;1132:254–263. doi: 10.1196/annals.1405.000. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 73.Baek WS, Bashey A, Sheean GL. Complete remission induced by rituximab in refractory, seronegative, muscle-specific, kinase-positive myasthenia gravis. J Neurol Neurosurg Psychiatry. 2007;78(7):771. doi: 10.1136/jnnp.2006.093567. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 74.Sanders DB, Hart IK, Mantegazza R, Shukla SS, Siddiqi ZA, De Baets MH, Melms A, Nicolle MW, Solomons N, Richman DP. An international, phase III, randomized trial of mycophenolate mofetil in myasthenia gravis. Neurology. 2008;71(6):400–406. doi: 10.1212/01.wnl.0000312374.95186.cc. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 75.•.Barth D, Nabavi Nouri M, Ng E, Nwe P, Bril V. Comparison of IVIg and PLEX in patients with myasthenia gravis. Neurology. 2011;76(23):2017–2023. doi: 10.1212/WNL.0b013e31821e5505. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 76.•.Kamel A, Essa M. Effectiveness of prethymectomy plasmapheresis on the short-term outcome of non-thymomatous generalized myasthenia gravis. Egypt J Neurol Psychiatr Neurosurg. 2009;46(1):161–168. [Google Scholar]
  • 77.••.Tracy MM, McRae W, Millichap JG. Graded response to thymectomy in children with myasthenia gravis. J Child Neurol. 2009;24(4):454–459. doi: 10.1177/0883073808325653. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 78.Rodriguez M, Gomez MR, Howard FM, Jr, Taylor WF. Myasthenia gravis in children: long-term follow-up. Ann Neurol. 1983;13(5):504–510. doi: 10.1002/ana.410130506. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 79.Adams C, Theodorescu D, Murphy EG, Shandling B. Thymectomy in juvenile myasthenia gravis. J Child Neurol. 1990;5(3):215–218. doi: 10.1177/088307389000500313. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 80.McCann LJ, Juggins AD, Maillard SM, Wedderburn LR, Davidson JE, Murray KJ, Pilkington CA. The Juvenile Dermatomyositis National Registry and Repository (UK and Ireland)–clinical characteristics of children recruited within the first 5 yr. Rheumatology (Oxford) 2006;45(10):1255–1260. doi: 10.1093/rheumatology/kel099. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 81.Miller LC, Michael AF, Kim Y. Childhood dermatomyositis. Clinical course and long-term follow-up. Clin Pediatr (Phila) 1987;26(11):561–566. doi: 10.1177/000992288702601101. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 82.Huber AM, Lang B, LeBlanc CM, Birdi N, Bolaria RK, Malleson P, MacNeil I, Momy JA, Avery G, Feldman BM. Medium- and long-term functional outcomes in a multicenter cohort of children with juvenile dermatomyositis. Arthritis Rheum. 2000;43(3):541–549. doi: 10.1002/1529-0131(200003)43:3&#x0003c;541::AID-ANR9&#x0003e;3.0.CO;2-T. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 83.Bohan A, Peter JB. Polymyositis and dermatomyositis (first of two parts) N Engl J Med. 1975;292(7):344–347. doi: 10.1056/NEJM197502132920706. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 84.Ramanan AV, Feldman BM. Clinical features and outcomes of juvenile dermatomyositis and other childhood onset myositis syndromes. Rheum Dis Clin North Am. 2002;28(4):833–857. doi: 10.1016/S0889-857X(02)00024-8. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 85.Feldman BM, Rider LG, Reed AM, Pachman LM. Juvenile dermatomyositis and other idiopathic inflammatory myopathies of childhood. Lancet. 2008;371(9631):2201–2212. doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(08)60955-1. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 86.•.Wedderburn LR, Rider LG. Juvenile dermatomyositis: new developments in pathogenesis, assessment and treatment. Best Pract Res Clin Rheumatol. 2009;23(5):665–678. doi: 10.1016/j.berh.2009.07.007. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 87.Pachman LM, Hayford JR, Chung A, Daugherty CA, Pallansch MA, Fink CW, Gewanter HL, Jerath R, Lang BA, Sinacore J, Szer IS, Dyer AR, Hochberg MC. Juvenile dermatomyositis at diagnosis: clinical characteristics of 79 children. J Rheumatol. 1998;25(6):1198–1204. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 88.•.Stringer E, Bohnsack J, Bowyer SL, Griffin TA, Huber AM, Lang B, Lindsley CB, Ota S, Pilkington C, Reed AM, Scuccimarri R, Feldman BM. Treatment approaches to juvenile dermatomyositis (JDM) across North America: The Childhood Arthritis and Rheumatology Research Alliance (CARRA) JDM Treatment Survey. J Rheumatol. 2010;37(9):1953–1961. doi: 10.3899/jrheum.090953. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 89.••.Huber AM, Giannini EH, Bowyer SL, Kim S, Lang B, Lindsley CB, Pachman LM, Pilkington C, Reed AM, Rennebohm RM, Rider LG, Wallace CA, Feldman BM. Protocols for the initial treatment of moderately severe juvenile dermatomyositis: results of a Children's Arthritis and Rheumatology Research Alliance Consensus Conference. Arthritis Care Res (Hoboken) 2010;62(2):219–225. doi: 10.1002/acr.20071. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 90.Bowyer SL, Blane CE, Sullivan DB, Cassidy JT. Childhood dermatomyositis: factors predicting functional outcome and development of dystrophic calcification. J Pediatr. 1983;103(6):882–888. doi: 10.1016/S0022-3476(83)80706-9. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 91.Al-Mayouf S, Al-Mazyed A, Bahabri S. Efficacy of early treatment of severe juvenile dermatomyositis with intravenous methylprednisolone and methotrexate. Clin Rheumatol. 2000;19(2):138–141. doi: 10.1007/s100670050032. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 92.Ramanan AV, Campbell-Webster N, Ota S, Parker S, Tran D, Tyrrell PN, Cameron B, Spiegel L, Schneider R, Laxer RM, Silverman ED, Feldman BM. The effectiveness of treating juvenile dermatomyositis with methotrexate and aggressively tapered corticosteroids. Arthritis Rheum. 2005;52(11):3570–3578. doi: 10.1002/art.21378. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 93.Olson NY, Lindsley CB. Adjunctive use of hydroxychloroquine in childhood dermatomyositis. J Rheumatol. 1989;16(12):1545–1547. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 94.Al-Mayouf SM, Laxer RM, Schneider R, Silverman ED, Feldman BM. Intravenous immunoglobulin therapy for juvenile dermatomyositis: efficacy and safety. J Rheumatol. 2000;27(10):2498–2503. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 95.Reiff A, Rawlings DJ, Shaham B, Franke E, Richardson L, Szer IS, Bernstein BH. Preliminary evidence for cyclosporin A as an alternative in the treatment of recalcitrant juvenile rheumatoid arthritis and juvenile dermatomyositis. J Rheumatol. 1997;24(12):2436–2443. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 96.Heckmatt J, Hasson N, Saunders C, Thompson N, Peters AM, Cambridge G, Rose M, Hyde SA, Dubowitz V. Cyclosporin in juvenile dermatomyositis. Lancet. 1989;1(8646):1063–1066. doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(89)92456-2. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 97.Riley P, Maillard SM, Wedderburn LR, Woo P, Murray KJ, Pilkington CA. Intravenous cyclophosphamide pulse therapy in juvenile dermatomyositis. A review of efficacy and safety. Rheumatology (Oxford) 2004;43(4):491–496. doi: 10.1093/rheumatology/keh082. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 98.Edge JC, Outland JD, Dempsey JR, Callen JP. Mycophenolate mofetil as an effective corticosteroid-sparing therapy for recalcitrant dermatomyositis. Arch Dermatol. 2006;142(1):65–69. doi: 10.1001/archderm.142.1.65. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 99.Yamada A, Ohshima Y, Omata N, Yasutomi M, Mayumi M. Steroid-sparing effect of tacrolimus in a patient with juvenile dermatomyositis presenting poor bioavailability of cyclosporine A. Eur J Pediatr. 2004;163(9):561–562. doi: 10.1007/s00431-004-1497-7. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 100.Cooper MA, Willingham DL, Brown DE, French AR, Shih FF, White AJ. Rituximab for the treatment of juvenile dermatomyositis: a report of four pediatric patients. Arthritis Rheum. 2007;56(9):3107–3111. doi: 10.1002/art.22856. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 101.•.Levy DM, Bingham CA, Kahn PJ, Eichenfield AH, Imundo LF. Favorable outcome of juvenile dermatomyositis treated without systemic corticosteroids. J Pediatr. 2010;156(2):302–307. doi: 10.1016/j.jpeds.2009.09.008. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Articles from Current Treatment Options in Neurology are provided here courtesy of Springer

RESOURCES