Skip to main content
. 2011 Oct;46(5):1646–1662. doi: 10.1111/j.1475-6773.2011.01279.x

Table 3.

California (CA) versus Non-CA Differences in CAHPS Scores for Medicare Beneficiaries in Medicare Advantage (MA) Plans and Fee-for-Service (FFS), with Standard and Full Case Mix Adjustments, 2008

Difference: CA−Non-CA

Standard Case Mix Full Adjustment Ethnicity Urban§


CAHPS Outcomes MA FFS MA FFS
Physician services
 Global rating of personal physician or nurse −0.93*** −0.68** −0.80*** −0.55*
 Global rating of specialist −1.53*** −0.09 −1.17*** 0.13
 Global rating of health care −0.89*** −0.39 −0.39* 0.01
 Doctor communication (four-item composite) −1.13*** −0.88*** −0.79*** −0.52*
 Ease of getting needed care (two-item composite) −2.47*** −0.69* −1.47*** 0.28
Immunizations
 Getting a flu shot in the previous year 3.36*** −2.18*** 3.91*** −1.27*
 Getting a pneumonia shot 1.43*** −6.22*** 3.31*** −3.35***
Plan services
 Global rating of MA plan or Medicare (if FFS) 0.35* −0.86*** 0.50*** −0.88**
 Getting care quickly (two-item composite) 0.90*** 0.12 1.94*** 1.06**
 Ease of paperwork (stand-alone report item) 1.75*** −2.49* 2.32*** −1.66
 Customer service (three-item composite) 0.01 −1.79* 0.43 −0.97
Part D prescription drugs
 Global rating of prescription drug coverage 1.57*** −0.7* 1.77*** −0.28
 Ease of getting needed drugs (three-item composite) 1.43*** −2.82*** 2.17*** −0.90**
 Getting information on drugs (two-item composite) 1.13** −2.31*** 1.82*** −1.20

Response scores are linearly rescaled to a 0–100 possible range to facilitate comparisons across measures.

Case mix adjusted using the standard CAHPS case mix adjustments.

§

Case mix adjusted using the standard CAHPS adjustments plus adjustments for race/ethnicity and urbanicity.

*

p<.05

**

p<.01

***

p<.001.

CAHPS, Consumer Assessment of Healthcare Providers and Systems.