Skip to main content
. 2011 Oct;46(5):1646–1662. doi: 10.1111/j.1475-6773.2011.01279.x

Table 4.

Effect of “Plan-A” on CAHPS Scores for Beneficiaries in Medicare Advantage (MA) Plans, California (CA) versus Non-CA, Full Case Mix Adjustments, 2008

MA Differences: CA−Non-CA

CAHPS Outcomes All CA Plans Only “Plan-A” Without “Plan-A”
Physician services
 Global rating of personal physician or nurse −0.80*** −0.17 −1.27***
 Global rating of specialist −1.17*** 0.31 −2.25***
 Global rating of health care −0.39* 0.39 −1.00***
 Doctor communication (four-item composite) −0.79*** 0.31 −1.62***
 Ease of getting needed care (two-item composite) −1.47*** −0.58 −2.32***
Immunizations
 Getting a flu shot in the previous year 3.91*** 9.14*** −0.53
 Getting a pneumonia shot 3.31*** 10.48*** −2.86***
Plan services
 Global rating of MA plan or Medicare (if fee-for-service) 0.50*** 1.57*** −0.40*
 Getting care quickly (two-item composite) 1.94*** 3.99*** 0.25
 Ease of paperwork (stand-alone report item) 2.32*** 4.31*** −0.88
 Customer service (three-item composite) 0.43 1.90*** −1.10**
Part D prescription drugs
 Global rating of prescription drug coverage 1.77*** 2.87*** 0.82***
 Ease of getting needed drugs (three-item composite) 2.17*** 3.76*** 0.74***
 Getting information on drugs (two-item composite) 1.82*** 3.53*** 0.20

Response scores are linearly rescaled to a 0–100 possible range to facilitate comparisons across measures.

Case mix adjusted using the standard CAHPS adjustments plus adjustments for race/ethnicity and urbanicity. The non-CA comparison group for all three differences is all non-CA MA plans; only the CA plans vary.

*

p<.05

**

p<.01

***

p<.001.

CAHPS, Consumer Assessment of Healthcare Providers and Systems.