Skip to main content
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2013 Jan 1.
Published in final edited form as: Res Autism Spectr Disord. 2012 January-March;6(1):96–108. doi: 10.1016/j.rasd.2011.03.009

Table 1.

Participant Characteristics

Demographic Data Percenta
Gender: Male 82.8
SESb
  Major Business/Professional 38.0
  Medium Business/Minor Professional 42.4
  Skilled Craftsman/Clerical/Sales 13.0
  Machine Operator/Semi-skilled 4.3
  Unskilled Laborers/Menial Service 2.2
Educational Statusc
    High School 13.8
    Partial College/Specialized Training 10.3
    College 75.9
Race
    Asian 1.6
    Black/African-American 2.5
    White 95.9
Ethnicity: Hispanic/Latino 0.8
Percent with Down syndrome 23.8
Adaptive Behavior Classificationd
    Moderately High (115–129) 0.8
    Adequate (86–114) 6.6
    Moderately Low (71–85) 23.0
    Low (≤70) 69.7
      Mild (55–70) 45.9
      Moderate (40–54) 15.6
      Severe (25–39) 7.4
      Profound (≤24) 0.8
Cognitive Data M SD Range
Full Scale IQ
   WISC-IV (n = 48) 98.02 19.83 44–131
   WAIS-III (n = 2) 100.00 ----- 0
   Stanford-Binet-5 (n = 30) 96.60 19.40 41–131
   Leiter-R (n = 32) 53.31 26.15 36–125

Notes.

a

Percentages in some categories do not sum to 100 due to rounding error.

b

Hollingshead (1975) scale used for participants without Down Syndrome (n = 92).

c

Indicator of SES for families of participants with Down Syndrome (n = 29), Hollingshead data were not collected in that study.

d

Categories reported are based on Adaptive Behavior Composite standard score ranges consistent with Sparrow, Cicchetti, and Balla (2005). Categorical data presented because 93 participants were administered the Vineland Adaptive Behavior Scales (Sparrow, Balla, & Cicchetti, 1984) and 29 were administered the Vineland-II (Sparrow et al., 2005) in separate studies.