Skip to main content
. 2011 Oct 21;6:140. doi: 10.1186/1748-717X-6-140

Table 4.

Comparisons of other evaluated parameters in present study (n = 12).

IMRT SA-VMAT PA-VMAT
mean ± SD mean ± SD p valuea mean ± SD p valueb p valuec
Delivery timed 13.7 ± 2.6 10.6 ± 1.8 < 0.01 6.4 ± 1.5 < 0.01 < 0.01
Treatment
Efficiencye
458.3 ± 21.9 439.2 ± 22.5 0.030 435.7 ± 25.3 0.047 0.732

a: compared with the parameters of IMRT; b: compared with the parameters of IMRT; c: compared with the parameters of SA-VMAT; d: presented as minutes; e: presented as monitor units (MUs);